Orange County NC Website
2 <br />1. Meet the criteria forsite plan approval listed in Article 14.3; <br />2. Address agency comments solicited during the site plan review process; and/or <br />3. Adhere to the design standards applicable within Economic Development Districts <br />as set forth in Article 6.29 of this ordinance. <br />In cases where number three (3) applies, the applicant is required to propose a design solution . <br />that is equal to, or better than, what could be obtained through the application of the criteria and <br />standards contained in the Design Manual. . <br />In this case, Buckhom Road Associates LLC has requested the waiving of fourteen (14) <br />standards of the Design Manual. Ultimately, the applicant is required to demonstrate to the <br />County that any and all deviations from the standards outlined within the Economic Development <br />District Design Manual are necessary and that the proposed solution(s) are consistent with the <br />intent of the manual. Please refer to Attachment Four (4) for staffs assessment of the project. <br />REVIEW PROCESS: A PDISUP project is processed in the exact same manner as all Class A <br />SUP applications. With these types of projects, however, the BOCC will.be required to: <br />1. Take action on the rezoning request to rezone the identified. properties from: I- <br />85/Buckhorn Road Economic Development (ED) District and/or Rural Residential One <br />(12-1) to Buckhorn Village Planned Development Economic Development District (BVPD- <br />ED). Action on approving or denying the rezoning application is considered to be a <br />Legislative decision made in accordance with the provisions of Article Twenty (20) of <br />the Zoning Ordinance. <br />2. If the application to rezone the properties is approved, the BOCC will then take action on <br />the PD/SUP application proposing the development of the property as a master planned <br />:mixed-use commercial site. Action on approving or denying the PD/SUP application is <br />considered to be a Quasi judicial decision made in accordance with the provisions of <br />Article Eight (8) of the Zoning Ordinance. <br />For more information on the review process associated with this project, please refer to <br />Attachment One (1) Request and Review Process Summary and Attachment Two (2) <br />Discussion of Legislative versus Quasi judicial actions. <br />In accordance with the provisions of Article(s) Eight (8) and Twenty (20) of the. Ordinance, staff <br />sent out approximately seventy (70) notices to adjacent property owners within five hundred <br />(500) feet of the subject properties, and posted notices on each properly informing the general <br />public of, the date, time, and location of the proposed Public Hearing. Staff also caused a legal <br />advertisement to appear within the News of Orange and the Chapel Hill Herald on February 13, <br />2008 and February 20, 2008 announcing the date, time, and location of the Public Hearing <br />wherethese applications would be reviewed. <br />PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: The Planned Development Guideline Manual (Attachment <br />Three 3 is intended to establish the various land use and regulatory standards that will <br />govern the development of this project. For this abstract, staff is supplying basic information <br />outlined within the Manual to supply the BOCC and Planning Board members with an overview <br />of the project. <br />