Browse
Search
ORD-2008-012 - Orange Co Zoning Ordinance -Buckhorn Rd Associates LLC Rezoning
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2008
>
ORD-2008-012 - Orange Co Zoning Ordinance -Buckhorn Rd Associates LLC Rezoning
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2013 8:45:29 AM
Creation date
10/14/2009 4:31:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/25/2008
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
c1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
16 <br />4. Waiver Four (4) as outlined on pages twenty-three (23) through twenty-four (24) of the <br />application reading as follows: <br />`The applicant requests a waiver from Section 2.4 Environmental Factors - <br />Grading and Erosion Control -Driveway and Access Drive Slopes of the EDD <br />Design Manual' <br />The applicant is requesting the ability to utilize NC DOT standards of two percent (2%) <br />or 1/a" per foot minimum and a twelve percent (12%) maximum accessJdrive slope <br />where necessary. The applicant argues that with the existing slope standards of two <br />percent (2%) minimum and five percent (5%) maximum for access/driveways is <br />common, there will be need for additional flexibility .given the number of connections <br />proposed with this development. .The additional slope value may . be necessary to <br />achieve the number of connections to facilitate safe, pedestrian friendly, circulation <br />within the development and between individual development districts. <br />Staff Comment: Staff supports the design solution in principle from the standpoint that <br />it is making use of existing NC DOT standards.and that it is an attempt to address the <br />need to make the development more pedestrian accessible. <br />Staff does not support granting a blanket `waiver' and believes the proposed. design <br />solution should be considered in the context of asite-specific development plan <br />showing the location and actual slope of these locations. <br />Staff recommends that the Board(s) consider allowing for modifications to the grading <br />and erosion control standards outlined within Section 2.4 of the EDD Design Manual <br />only when the applicant can demonstrate on asite-specific development plan the need <br />to, and benefits of, the proposed design solution. <br />5. Waiver Five (5) as outlined on page thirty (30) of the application reading as follows: <br />`The applicant requests a waiver from Section 3.I Architectural Design - <br />Building Setbacks and Height of the EDD Design Manual and the required ten <br />(10) foot driveway setback' <br />The applicant is requesting the ability to modify the existing setback and building <br />height limitations for internal property lines for the Buckhorn Village project to allow <br />for: <br />a. A front, side, and rear yard setback for freestanding buildings and structures of <br />ten (10) feet versus twenty-five (25) feet, <br />b. A setback for in-line shops and buildings of one (1) foot for front and rear <br />setbacks and a zero (0) side yard setback, <br />c. A zero (0) line setback for buildings adjacent to vehicular use areas, storage <br />areas, and signs. <br />d. The applicant is proposing to utilize the existing setbacks outlined within <br />Section 3.1 of the Design Manual for all perimeter property lines. <br />The rationale for the request is that it will allow the applicant to achieve the downtown <br />center theme as proposed within District II. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.