Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-13-2009 - Joint Meeting with Housing
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 10-13-2009
>
Agenda - 10-13-2009 - Joint Meeting with Housing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 12:49:49 PM
Creation date
10/12/2009 11:19:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/13/2009
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20091013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Item IV <br />From: Community Reinvestment Association of North Carolina <br />To: Tara Fikes <br />Orange County Department of Housing and Community Development <br />RE: Manufactured Homes Survey <br />Manufactured Housing in Orange County is a valuable and prolific housing resource. It faces several <br />threats, but it continues to remain a popular choice for many of the County's residents. A short <br />summary of the findings shows that: <br />• Only 2.6 percent of mobile homes not estimated to be abandoned in Orange County are vacant <br />• There are 84 abandoned units within mobile home parks in Orange County. <br />• There are more abandoned units than there are vacant units. <br />• Singlewide mobile homes constitute ninety -two percent of manufactured housing in Orange <br />More than 89 p rcent of lots in Orange County are occupied. ore than 6 rcen of lots in <br />Ora ounty a occupied by residents. The difference is ac ounte for by aband ned units <br />on xistin lots. �� �� —� <br />Melhodolokv I I I I / I I I I I <br />CR NC sen five rveyor to arks across Or ge Co y. In so a instances, parks ere vi ited more <br />tha once, to add a laye of i er -co er relic ility. not r staff member acted as t e coo for of <br />the work. CRA -NC su yed 9A parks. Anothe eight parks eclin d to participate in a survey. Seven <br />par . <br />The data was recorded and quantified into quartiles. The categories of analysis included: <br />• Amenities (signage, playgrounds, street lights, sidewalks, common areas, underground power <br />lines). This category was the most significant. Parks could get as many as 4 points or as few as <br />one negative point. <br />• Vacancy rates for lots: <br />• Unit occupancy rate: Both of these indicators are seen as proxies for the observed preference of <br />mobile home park resident. On both, the range was from 2 to -1 points. <br />• Abandoned Score. The instrument punished parks with more than an average amount of <br />abandoned homes, on the grounds that this is a major hazard and a proxy for the general <br />maintenance efforts by the park owner. Range from 2 to -2 points. <br />• Doublewide score: On the logic that doublewides are both more spacious as well as likely to be <br />newer, the instrument rewarded parks with a higher than average amount of doublewide <br />homes. There is a park in Orange County, with doublewides for all 103 occupied units, which is <br />exceptional. Doublewide scores ranged from 2 to 0 points. <br />Atmosphere: In each of the five park access and environment scores, parks were rewarded with <br />between 1 and -1 points. The road scores were based upon the presence of asphalt and the <br />description by surveyors. <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.