Orange County NC Website
2 <br />This November 2008 projection showed the need for additional capacity (i.e., Elementary <br />School #11) by 2010-11 by indicating proposed conditions could be over 26 students if <br />projections were consistent (i.e., on-line) with the comparison of actual enrollment in November <br />2009 with projected enrollment from the prior year. This comparison (noted in column 2 above), <br />although not with the official November 15, 2009, show 20t" day enrollment at this school level <br />of 5,225 students versus 5,406 which was projected, a decease of 181 students below <br />projections. Again, although this number is not official, this is an appreciable decrease below <br />the projection that mathematically would make ensuing year student projections and <br />complementary capacity needs more moderate. In other words, the hypothetical need for a <br />new school in 2010-11 would likely move to later years. New projections will be part of the 2010 <br />SAPFO TAC Report (based on November 2009 enrollment). <br />The Certificate of Adequate Public Schools (CAPS) system does not run on projections of <br />future years. The system is based on actual enrollment in current year versus actual capacity <br />and/or programmed capacity. In this manner, each year the system is reset to show the actual <br />remaining capacity. New growth is certified against remaining capacity, so if the 20t" day <br />numbers were used, 281 student stations would be available which could equate to possible <br />approval of 1,068 single family homes. <br />(281 x 1 /.263 = 1, 068) <br />Note: .263 students generated for elementary schools per single-family detached, 2007 <br />The new student generation rates are more realistic and would provide a better gauge of the <br />student impact of new growth. Higher student generation rates equate to less potential growth <br />approvals. <br />Class Size <br />In 2008-09, upon the opening of Morris Grove Elementary, the SAPFO ordinance changed the <br />elementary capacity of schools based on prior state legislation to reduce class size from 1:23 to <br />1:21 for K-3 classes. SAPFO, as reported by the prior County Attorney, does not necessarily <br />have to conform to DPI rules, nonetheless these class size standards were put into effect. The <br />impacts of this change were realized in both school districts. However, in the Chapel Hill- <br />Carrboro School District, the opening of Elementary School #10 in 2008-09 did not create 585 <br />new student capacity school level wide but only 323 because class size reductions decrease <br />school capacity. <br />The impact of implementing `mandated' new class size ratios therein relates to a loss in school <br />level capacity of 262 seats or the equivalent of 45% of a new school or in capital cost terms <br />roughly $14 million. This implementation also made the new capacity added by Elementary <br />School #10 not go as far before the projections showed the need for Elementary School #11. <br />Depending on annual growth rates of elementary students (100 per year estimated), new <br />schools typically would be needed after 4-5 years instead of the two-year CIP turnaround <br />created by implementing class size. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: Project cost estimate is between $31-32 million closer to $32 million <br />including engineering. Lottery funds totaling $974,000 are already in place toward funding <br />engineering costs. Using $31 million as the financing amount, the financial impact would be as <br />follows: <br />