Orange County NC Website
~~ ~ .~ <br />No fund balance is anticipated in the capital outlay budget. <br />Dr. Mike Simmons spoke to the Board regarding the impact <br />of $380 per pupil allocation. <br />Commissioner Gustaveson suggested $387 per pupil allocation <br />to deal with the significant net loss far the County School's <br />program objectives for this year. This would provide approximately <br />$34,000 in additional funds. He added that the proposed $387 figurF <br />does not take into consideration the requirements of the Creech Bi'` <br />of the Fulcher Report. <br />Chairman Whitted stated he felt the Board could assume that the <br />State will fund the Exceptional Child program and also deal with <br />the teacher/pupil ratio situation. He added that the more local <br />monies put into these programs this year lessen the counties' <br />chances of receiving monies in the future. He added that he felt <br />the Fulcher Report will be dealt with in the 1979-80 budget of <br />the General Assembly. <br />Commissioner Pinney stated he did not feel the $380 appropriati_;:t <br />was sufficient and he proposed a figure of $388 per pupil. <br />Mr. Whined stated he felt the State would deal with the teaches.:/ . <br />pupil ratie problem in the Fulcher Report. He added the $396 and <br />the $380 figures are comparable figures given the supplemental <br />appropriation from the State. <br />Commissioner Walker stated he had heard members of the Board <br />express their desire to not increase the tax rate and, if the <br />per pupil allocation is $388 or $387, this would mean an increase. <br />He suggested this allocation be trimmed to $374 to prevent a <br />tax increase. <br />Discussion ensued among members of the Board regarding the <br />different affect a $387 allocation would have over $3.$.Q. <br />Figures offered by members of the Board for the per pupil <br />allocation were $374, $380, $386, $387 and $388. <br />A consensus of the Board was to accept the $387 figure far the <br />per capita allocation for current expense. This action changed <br />the Manager's proposed budget allocation for current expense from <br />$4,045,140 to $3,953,205. <br />The Chairman asked the Board tv discuss the capital outlay <br />allocation for the two school systems. He asked that $50,000 be <br />added to the County's allocation to include monies for maintenance <br />of the Stanback School. He stated he felt some monies should be <br />included in the budget for this purpose. He further suggested <br />that the County's capital outlay appropriation be $283,200 and <br />that Chapel Hill's appropriation be $339,200. Chapel Hill had <br />originally requested $450,000 and the County had requested <br />$315,000. Both systems have been cut; however, this allocation <br />will provide a 6~ increase over what~was proposed in the Manager's <br />budget. <br />Commissioner Walker spoke against this allocation. He questioned <br />the distribution of funds between the two systems, and stated movie <br />should be provided where the need is. . <br />A consensus of the Board was to allocate $283,200 to the County <br />schools capital eutlay budget and to allocate $338,200 to the Chapel <br />hil~-Carrboro City school capital outlay budget, making a total <br />budget appropriation for capital outlay of $622,400 instead of the <br />recommended $572,400. <br />