Orange County NC Website
~:, <br />v~.o <br />from the County Planning Department, and Agatha Johnson, Clerk to the Board. <br />Chairman Whitted asked that prior to the meeting convening as a public <br />hearing, that the Board of Commissioners discuss one item regarding the <br />Orange-Person-Chatham Mental Health Center. He informed the Board that at <br />a recent legislative conference, one concern was to support efforts to get <br />4.25 million dollars restored to the State budget for the coming fiscal <br />year. This recommendation was made by the Secretary to the Department of <br />Human Resources, however, this was left out of the Advisory Budget Committee <br />proposed budget. Funds which were recommended by the Committee were 1.25 <br />million for Mental Health in designated locations. He stated that many <br />counties represented at the conference indicated that they would propose <br />local legislation for additional funding for Mental Health which hopefully <br />would draw to the attention of the General Assembly, the need for addi- <br />tional funding. <br />Mr. Whitted stated he had asked the County Attorney to draw up a <br />local bill for the Board's consideration and a resolution in support of <br />an appropriation of $172,000 for the Orange-Person-Chatham Mental Health <br />Center. <br />Upon motion of Commissioner Willhoxt, seconded by Commissioner <br />Gustaveson, it was moved and adopted to approve the Resolution and the <br />Clerk was instructed to forward copies of the Resolution and the Bi11 to <br />the Orange and Person Counties Congressional Delegatien. <br />(For copy of Resolution and Bill, see page 5gp of this book.) <br />Chairman Whitted then turned the meeting over to Dr. Robert Bonar. <br />Dr. Bonar informed the Boards that the rezoning request of Sunmark <br />Industries had been withdrawn. <br />Dr. Bonar then referred to Item #2 on the Agenda: Request of Gurtis <br />Bane. This request is to rezone from Residential to General Commercial <br />105 acres out of 260.75 acres in Eno Township. <br />Eddie Kirk from the Planning Staff informed the Boards that this pro- <br />perty is located between I-$5 and Old Highway Number 10. Uses generally <br />found in General commercial zones include public and private utilities, <br />sale of farm merchandise, mobile home sales, offices, wholesale and re- <br />tail sales, automobile service stations, and non-residential storage of <br />closed structures. <br />He stated that presently found in the area are businesses of general <br />commercial nature, a mobile home park, church property, and two sub- <br />divisions. Mr. Bane has drawn plans, which will be submitted to the Board <br />at a later time, which indicate his desire to establish a subdivision with <br />approximately 36 lots in the area. <br />Chairman Bonar asked if there were person present who wished to speak <br />in favor of the rezoning request. <br />Mr. Curtis Bane stated he had sought the advise aF professionals of <br />how to manage this property and there is a question in their minds as to <br />whether or not this property could be used for anything other than commer- <br />cial. He pointed out to the Board that utilities lines run through the <br />property as well as railroad tracks. He stated he felt this was an ideal <br />location to serve the growth of the area in coming years. <br />Rufus Caulder, a land planner from Durham, stated in his opinion, this <br />property is ideal for general commercial use, with the accessability to <br />I-$5 and with the railroad tracks located conveniently. <br />Chairman Bonar asked if anyone wished to speak against the rezoning <br />request. <br />An unidentified lady spoke against the rezoning of this property. <br />An unidentified male stated the letter he received stated this pro- <br />perty was located on State Road 1812, when the property actually is situ- <br />ated on State Road 1713. This person further spoke against the rezoning <br />request. <br />Discussin ensued between the two Boards. The consensus of the Boards <br />was that improper notice had been given regarding the location of this <br />property, as it ip~:located on State Road 1713 and not State Road 1812. <br />