Orange County NC Website
r. <br />' '~"~Zn the Income Maintenance section of the proposed budget, $40,564 is <br />projected for P.FDC (IV-A). Last year's total was $9,181. <br />Under the MA Program, $47,307 is being requested, as compared to the <br />$17,603 figure of last year. <br />Mr. Ward informed the Board that the Social Services Board expected <br />a dramatic increase in the Food Stamp Program next Fall, since new guide- <br />lines are being issued. The County Participation amount for 1978-79 is <br />budgeted at $49,120. Last year's amount was $8,544. <br />Under Special Assistance to Adults, $3,306 is requested in the admini- <br />strative budget. Five hundred, forty-nine ($549) was requested last year. <br />The Total County cost in the administrative duget is projected at <br />$321,717. This is compared to a cast of $289,649 for last year. Mr. <br />Ward stated the increase in the budget is due to the service capacity <br />increase. Added in this budget is one Social Worker 2 in the Supportive <br />Section. This worker will work in the Health Department in certifying a <br />health screening program and working in the MA Program in the 5oci~1 Ser- <br />vices Department. One additional eligibility specialist is requested fox <br />the Food Stamp Program, however, this worker would not be hired until <br />October, 1978, if at a11. Also requested is a one-half time Social Worker <br />II for the WIN Program. These three positions have caused the service <br />capacity increase. <br />Mr. Ward then reviewed with the two Boards a breakdown of the Public <br />Assistance Expenditures. He stated the number of AFDC recipients has in- <br />creased from 937 in 1976-77 to 1132 in November of 1977. The State pro- <br />jection is 485 per month in 1978-79. The total cost in the AFDC Program <br />for 1978-79 is estimated at $873,000. This year the Department will over <br />spend in this program, .however, it is projected this spending will level- <br />off. The annual county share for this program is $137,254 which i.s a <br />$7,933 dollar increase over last year. <br />The AFDC-FC Program is greatly reduced over previous years due to new <br />Federal policies and interpretations. The Social Services Board is pro- <br />jecting (5) additional children to receive AFDC-FC for 1978-79. Presently <br />there are (4) children participating in this program. Clients who were <br />in the AFDC-FC Program have been shifted to the State AFDG Foster Care <br />Program which means an increase to the County. <br />The State/County Special Assistance to Adults Program has a projec- <br />tion of 65 at a cost of $180 per recipients. Mr. Ward explained that the <br />cost of rest home care increased last April 1st and is expected to increase <br />again in January. The current cost is $154. This is a 50/50 State/County <br />Program. <br />The Social Services Director reviewed the Medicaid Program breakdown <br />for 1978-79. The cost of the Medicaid Program makes up about fifty percent <br />of the total Social Services budget. This year's Medical Assistance bud- <br />get is projected at $2,182,480. <br />An estimate of $167,924 is projected for Title XX for Program Staff <br />and Program Operations. This is a decrease of $2,839 over the 1977-78 <br />allocation. The $167,924 is the current level of expenditures with little <br />room for expansion. <br />The Chore Assistance Program, which is a contract purchased service <br />with Countil on Aging, projects a total of $3,`200 with $2,400 coming from <br />Federal and $800 from the County. Another purchased service is Day Care <br />for Children with $176,047 budgeted for 1978-79, and $1,000 for Family <br />Planning. <br />Mr. Ward reviewed the Federal share of Title XX monies which is esti- <br />mated quarterly: <br />July - Sept. 1978 $154,044 <br />Oct - Dec.. 1978 182,052 <br />Jan -Mar. 1979 182,052 <br />Apr -June 1979 182,052 Total is $700,200 <br />Mr. Ward explained that regulations point out if Counties underspend <br />the first quarter, that monies is last. Counties cannot underspend more <br />than five percent during the second quarter. The current level of spending <br />quarterly is $170,000. <br />