Orange County NC Website
r.. <br />`r~', .~ <br />Item 13: A report'on the condition of two buses operated by the <br />Recreation Department'is included with this agenda. The attachment <br />stated the Recreation Department is currently operating two buses. One, <br />a 1956 Chevrolet, was acquired from the State Surplus Property Agendy. <br />The other, a 1962 Chevrolet, was acquired from the Federal Surplus Pro- <br />perty Agency. The staff's intention was to use this vehicle as a source <br />of spare parts to keep the older bus in operation. The bus, however, was <br />found to be in better mechanical condition than the bus currently being <br />operated. Therefore, the bus was repaired and placed in service. This <br />bus while larger has a gear ratio that makes it more suitable to use on <br />trips of some distance. <br />The Commissioners then reviewed a report of the conditions of both <br />buses. <br />Commissioner Willhoit stated he was bothered that the County has to <br />operate buses of this category. He added he would like further assurance <br />that these buses are safe. <br />The County Manager stated these buses have passed State Inspection, <br />and the safety equipment on the buses does operate, however, this does <br />not mean the buses are not subject to breakdowns. <br />Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner Walker <br />it was moved and adopted to approve the budget amendment of $350 to cover <br />the cost of a bus. These funds are to come from the County's Con- <br />tingency Fund into the Recreation Department's fund. Commissioner Willhoit <br />vote nay to this motion. <br />For copy of budget amendment, see page 535 of this book. <br />It was pointed out that the Recreation Department should be operating <br />the newest and the best buses, that the County can affort. It was also <br />pointed out that long trips usually are chartered by commercial transits. <br />Commissioner Walker asked to be excused from the meeting at this time. <br />Item 9: The Tax Supervisor requested the tax refunds as stated be <br />approved by the Board of Commissioners. <br />A. Everett I,. Rush - Mr. Rush's property is split by a fire district <br />boundary. The entire tract was assessed with a fire district tax for 1975, <br />1976, and 1977. Mr. Rush is requesting a tax refund for the property not <br />located inside the fire district, the total refund amounting to $109.51. <br />Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner <br />Willhoit, it was moved and adopted to approve the refund by $109.51 to <br />Everett T,. Rush. <br />B. Robert D. Bauman - Mr. Bauman's household personal property was <br />overvalued by $875 for 1977 as the result of a clerical error. <br />Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner <br />Willhoit, it was moved and adopted to approve the refund of $9.06 to <br />Robert D. Bauman. <br />C. Ebert Paul Edwards - Mr. Edwards incorrectly listed his monthly <br />rent and listed household personal property for 1977 at six times this <br />incorrent rent, resulting in an overevaluation of personal property. <br />Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson„ seconded by Commissioner Pinney, <br />it was moved and adopted to approve the refund request of Ebert P. Edwards <br />in the amount of $14.10. <br />D. Geraldine B. VanVoethem - This taxpayer mistakenly listed her 1971 <br />Volkswagen as a 1977 model on her 1977 listing. <br />Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner Pinney <br />it was moved and adopted to grant the refund of $40.83 to Geraldine <br />VanBOethem. <br />E. Carolyn 'H. Daniels - Ms. Daniels was a Virginia resident on <br />January 1, 1977, but listed personal property with her husband for taxa- <br />tion in Orange County. Virginia authorities required her to list and pay <br />taxes on a 1972 Maverick owned by her which was also listed and taxed in <br />Orange County. <br />