Browse
Search
ORD-2009-030 - Zoning Ord-Level of Non Residential Zoned Area Permitted Comm Activity Nodes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2009
>
ORD-2009-030 - Zoning Ord-Level of Non Residential Zoned Area Permitted Comm Activity Nodes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 10:27:37 AM
Creation date
9/4/2009 4:47:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/18/2009
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
C2
Document Relationships
Agenda - 08-18-2009 - 5b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2009\Agenda - 08-18-2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Q` <br />b �` <br />61 Judith Wegner. You said there were other subcategories in the Comprehensive Plan and it seems that having an across the <br />62 board approach when we know these are different in character, is questionable. I also am not sure what we should do with this <br />63 so none of those listing items seems very satisfactory at this point without getting into it more. How does the small area plan fit <br />64 into this? <br />65 <br />66 Michael Harvey: From staffs prospective, we go to the Board of County Commissioners and they authorize the development of <br />67 the small area plan, the Board sanctions the process, we begin the process. Then they took a few months to review and <br />68 approve. <br />69 <br />70 Judith Wegner. I really don't understand why we go through extensive planning and then we sit around before we have an <br />71 official stance. I am confused by that. <br />72 <br />73 Michael Harvey: That is a question you will have to ask the elected officials. <br />74 <br />75 Judith Wegner. How can we sit in our 6:30 sessions what we want to learn about, I wonder if we get an overview of the different <br />76 small area plan processes that have been worked on in recent memory and I would really like to know how we set priorities <br />77 about what is going to happen.. I know White Cross Development has not been dealt with yet. I can see a maturation process <br />78 that you are a rural node until you are certified for a small area plan and at that time, you finish that up and that's kind of the <br />79 cycle where you deal with some of this. I think those are all important plans that people did a lot of work on and I would think that <br />80 would be hard to have us understand it so we're all working together around it. <br />81 <br />82 Craig Benedict: At the August 24 Quarterly Public Hearing, we will have information items will be what we do with existing small <br />83 area plans we have not implemented yet and we will add the context you asked for tonight, how does something get in queue to <br />84 start a small area plan and how can we get it implemented in a better timeframe. Some of the small area plans we've done have <br />85 languished because they have waited for the Comprehensive Plan update to be adopted. <br />86 <br />87 Judith Wegner: I could see, hypothetically, the speedway areas I remember, we talked about what might go there and I could <br />88 see that could be a good framework when talking about conditional use zoning. You might make more headway if we took each <br />89 of those examples and saw what was in it could really give us some idea about what aspects you could build into a unified <br />90 development ordinance. <br />91 <br />92 Craig Benedict: We may have something at the August Planning Board meeting as a precursor as to what would be discussed <br />93 at the August 24 Quarterly Public Hearing. <br />94 <br />95 Judith Wegner: Is there a reason not to do it in July. <br />96 <br />97 Craig Benedict: Staff will have a meeting on Friday about exactly what you are talking about. I will talk about it with them. <br />98 <br />99 Judith Wegner: Are there other things in line? <br />100 <br />101 Brian Crawford: Craig, when we get together to discuss the agenda, let's talk about these issues and I will talk to Judith. <br />102 <br />103 Perdita Holtz: It sounds like what you are looking for is just to inform the new Planning Board members what is in the plans not <br />104 that you are expecting us to come in July with how we will implement those plan. <br />105 <br />106 Brian Crawford: Mark Marcoplos suggested to me that before we make any motions that I give everyone on the Planning Board <br />107 a chance to speak so before we make a motion, let's make sure every speaks. <br />108 <br />109 Mary Bobbitt- Cooke: Thank you for thinking about what we need to know as far as all the different types of nodes and all the <br />110 different planning those different groups have done at different times in the County. I am wondering if this Ordinance has to be <br />111 tied to that. I am looking back at our history with this and the one thing about the White Cross area with the store that has <br />112 trouble with the septic field has a long history. There was supposed to be an evaluation and it wasn't done. This person has a <br />113 long history of waiting. I understand there is a fabulous restaurant that would like the ability to expand to meet the customer <br />114 demand. This is recommending that each of the rural community activity nodes be limited to 10 acres with a five acre limitation <br />115 and if they need additional property or rezoning that they submit a rezoning plan. <br />116 <br />117 MOTION made Mary Bobbitt-Cooke to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners amend the Orange County Zoning <br />118 Ordinance as presented to the Planning Board by the staff. Seconded by Larry Wright. <br />119 VOTE: Unanimous <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.