Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
L211Z1200S TUB 18:46 FAX on <br />CID <br />L UnllwfuliDekgiitiobotLegisla4veAuthuritYorpovmr- <br />Valaw.incolporaWis by ref=Hcaffic law or rdle of another governmental mot or <br />ddeibn <br />inivawbody and MY future GbHnPs'tD that lave or tale this may constitute an unlawful gat <br />of legislative authority. 'The unlawful delegation •robimn can occur When a law or cute is <br />m*�e jr;t North Carolina law jnw wmtm a federal <br />` automatically change when those <br />05 amencled► OM ftNorth dfrolina law m R <br />orthelx&l.tim. Oar <br />anim-Winblits occur without action jnmy;4sseTt that the state's legislative <br />Mm present issue involves, local 6rdinances 6W <br />a0i�iityhasb= given to dw MmIll RVAcy- <br />sat that it is <br />ibwrpor,,WmVsprep=dbyorapj;rovodbya-Uederal;tgmyFEMA. One may as <br />a floodplain without any actin an ft pad <br />unlawfid jGpeniij, FNMA -to change What conafiftdis <br />of the county. dr city. <br />orame required by VPMA aftaillptm to <br />The N.C. iiiadel Flood bainagm-Prevendon <br />adopt by rererme future gW6 tntr Ila-city. adopts by reference a statute, together with PAY <br />udm <br />future mendments thercto, ther6 is an unlawful delegation of legislative authority, rendering the <br />Ord1nah=un0OntftAo0nL Ddnklm v r, 25 2d 1071 <br />Y_.MoWyeyggDhd&�6470.App. 613P <br />980). See also pMjc.X. Mm, 45 Mich. App- 255,206 NA 2d 511 (1973); IV. State <br />2d640(lW6�,1R—d1m—DdMt <br />C&trftction Cade Cointolm-lo 6 blich. App. 491,293 N.W. <br />mi!m -n <br />.of goith MoLa .inc- 346 N- .2d 737 (SM. 1994); <br />Jnnabluts S30r. App. ,54u,732P.2d9l9(1987),, <br />,gtLMMM Qjhor'Coat$ hold that . a statute W aftillptS to . !AC0rP0ratb futime cbaigcsof <br />another gmt% code, Togoliflo", frol <br />qq6onA1As-.%0 umb <br />legislative power. See, e.g., kg:.a- <br />Cali �ia �i - � d App. <br />4th 245, 64 M RptF. 2d 129, 134 <br />Z6D ��� 55 *CFA. A -% 8311LApp.3dgO2,404N.E,2d352,.356 <br />(CACLApp- 1997); jig v. Pollution OgtWI-6 -6 <br />_.j bift - stab Dd. of ph UMm.579, 19P.2d <br />(1980�' - <br />357,319111-D=928 <br />837.942-U3 (1980); Michigan i v. N D Wou3rers' pWbilit tex mEaMm <br />- - I <br />Ord re App. 59., 5863 <br />1jumau 134YX,,b.A,,.723.352-NW.?471:?,-715'(1984);Mcyer'V'L -370 <br />P.2d367,37l(1979));::. - DfC lain v. R-1 Mem Tic, 521 N.W.2d-130,132,133 (S.D. <br />11 'Bmkff a Ass!h.x. St ($D. 1984X <br />QOdson 1P ate., 346 IM2d. 731. 744 <br />1994); TIM endent v. �S%t .957qsi2d257,623P.2d683.685(19&0) ... Mhe adoption by mfe == Of - <br />future legislation and iLdes are ur01WRI60131- IjAf an 1Vlfrs. Assn. 352N.W.2dit715- <br />Ing caroms of statutory construction. apply to the ktorprolitiOn Of On OTdimm- <br />113 W-C AM IN 192.,417 SX.2d 536,537 <br />are v. Bd. of Adiust—mmt Of City of Ki Communications Corporation 1. �tonia ls�N.C. <br />(1993) CmtenW citation Omitted), Mortis <br />App. sm- sas.md 419 (2003)- <br />