Browse
Search
ORD-2009-029 - Amending Zoning Ordinance-Time Limit of Start Construction of Planned Development
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2009
>
ORD-2009-029 - Amending Zoning Ordinance-Time Limit of Start Construction of Planned Development
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 10:33:46 AM
Creation date
9/4/2009 3:59:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/18/2009
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
C1
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-18-2009 - C1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2009\Agenda - 05-18-2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Hemminger asked how 48 months was selected and it was answered that <br />permits would have to be obtained from NCDOT and easements would also have to be <br />obtained. This is a reasonable amount of time for these things. <br />Commissioner Yuhasz asked for clarity on whether major projects would have to come back <br />every 12 months to show that they were proceeding. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked Michael Harvey to check and see how Chapel Hill and <br />Carrboro do extensions and for the Board of County Commissioners and the Planning Board to <br />see. He thinks that when there is an extension, then the applicant could stipulate how many <br />months the extension should be. He thinks that the staff should monitor progress. <br />Commissioner Jacobs made reference to the first page and that the applicant can only <br />request an extension from the Board of County Commissioners upon the favorable <br />recommendation of the Planning Board. He thinks that this is wrong, and he would like to <br />change this. He respects the Planning Board, but there might be other interests of the Board of <br />County Commissioners that would make it important to have an extension. <br />Commissioner Jacobs made reference to the statement, "It should be noted that no <br />extension request shall be approved if such request represents an alteration." He asked for a <br />definition of an alteration. Michael Harvey pointed this definition out in the article. <br />There was no public comment. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Pelissier to refer <br />the matter to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned in time for the August 18, <br />2009 BOCC meeting. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />2. Zoning Ordinance Amendment: To receive public comment on proposed amendments to <br />Article Four (4) Establishment of Permitted Use Table and Schedule Section(s) 4.2.8 and <br />4.2.9 of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance to modify existing standards governing the <br />acceptable level of non - residential zoned area permitted within Commercial activity, Rural <br />Neighborhood, and Rural Community Activity Nodes. <br />AGENDA ITEM: C2 <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />Review of a proposal to amend <br />Section(s) 4.2.8 and 4.2.9 <br />of the Zoning Ordinance <br />to modify existing standards governing the acceptable level of non - residential zoning within <br />Nodes <br />ISSUE: <br />*The Zoning Ordinance, specifically Section 4.2.8 and 4.2.9, establish limits on the total amount <br />of non - residential zoning permitted within a Node, <br />*The Ordinance would allow up to a total of nine (9) acres but only in instances where existing <br />density within a given Node is similar to existing Transition Areas, <br />elf density within the Nodes is not similar to existing Transition Areas, non - residential zoning is <br />limited to five (5) acres, <br />•The review of a recent rezoning petition during the November 2008 Quarterly Public Hearing <br />brought these limitations under greater scrutiny, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.