Browse
Search
ORD-2009-029 - Amending Zoning Ordinance-Time Limit of Start Construction of Planned Development
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2009
>
ORD-2009-029 - Amending Zoning Ordinance-Time Limit of Start Construction of Planned Development
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 10:33:46 AM
Creation date
9/4/2009 3:59:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/18/2009
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
C1
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-18-2009 - C1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2009\Agenda - 05-18-2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />Excerpt of Draft Minutes 13 <br />Commissioner Yuhasz asked for clarity on whether major projects would have to come back <br />every 12 months to show that they were proceeding. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked Michael Harvey to check and see how Chapel Hill and <br />Carrboro do extensions and for the Board of County Commissioners and the Planning Board to <br />see. He thinks that when there is an extension, then the applicant could stipulate how many <br />months the extension should be. He thinks that the staff should monitor progress. <br />Commissioner Jacobs made reference to the first page and that the applicant can only <br />request an extension from the Board of County Commissioners upon the favorable <br />recommendation of the Planning Board. He thinks that this is wrong, and he would like to <br />change this. He respects the Planning Board, but there might be other interests of the Board of <br />County Commissioners that would make it important to have an extension. <br />Commissioner Jacobs made reference to the statement, "It should be noted that no <br />extension request shall be approved if such request represents an alteration." He asked for a <br />definition of an alteration. Michael Harvey pointed this definition out in the article. <br />There was no public comment. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Pelissier to refer <br />the matter to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned in time for the August 18, <br />2009 BOCC meeting. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.