Orange County NC Website
<br />Review of a proposal to amend <br />the Orange County Zoning Ordinance to establish regulations for drive-thru facilities <br />ISSUE: <br />•Concern has been expressed over the pollution generated by vehicles idling within adrive-thru <br />lane and what effect- this would have on the environment as well as passing pedestrians, <br />•There is also concern over the interaction between vehicles attempting to park versus those <br />attempting to access the drive-thru, <br />•Currently there are no regulations governing the development/use of drive-thru facilities, <br />•Drive-thru facilities are banned within the Hillsborough Area Economic Development District <br />and within the Efland Cheeks Overlay Zoning District (ECOD), which was adopted in 2008 <br />PROPOSAL: <br />Staff recommended adopting regulatory standards that would include the following <br />standards: <br />•Require a fifty (50) foot setback for such facilities from property lines, <br />•Require atwenty-five (25) foot vegetative buffer separating the drive-thru lane from pedestrian <br />and parking areas, <br />•Require that menu boards utilized in connection with drive-thru facilities shall not be visible <br />from external roadways, <br />•Limit the overall number of drive-thru facilities that can be developed within amulti-use non- <br />residential development to one (1) per ten (10) acres with a maximum cap of five (5) per <br />project, <br />•Require one hundred eighty (180) feet of drive isle to support drive-thru facilities, <br />Planning Board Recommendation: <br />The Planning Board reviewed this item at their April 1, 2009 meeting where the following <br />motion was made: <br />•Recommend the County initiate a comprehensive and countywide awareness education <br />program about idling and the contaminants it puts in our air, and <br />•Recommend the BOCC disregard staff's two (2) options and take no action on adopting <br />regulations banning development of drive-thru facilities within the County's planning jurisdiction <br />(Option 1) or adopting comprehensive development standards for drive-thru facilities (Option 2). <br />Administration Recommendation: <br />•Receive the Planning Board recommendation, <br />•If necessary, deliberate further on the proposed amendment, <br />•Close the public hearing, and <br />•Adopt Option Two (2) -specifically adopt the proposed regulations detailed within Attachment <br />One (1) of the packet. <br />Commissioner Pelissier asked if there are possibilities of a standalone drive-thru facility <br />and Craig Benedict said yes. The existing regulations allow this. <br />