Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-01-2009 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 09-01-2009
>
Agenda - 09-01-2009 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 12:36:46 PM
Creation date
8/28/2009 4:23:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/1/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20090901
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
RES-2009-065 Reimbursement Resolution - Solid Waste Transfer Station Project
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
217
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
year tenant lease to commence in the fall. Leasing and /or lease renewal could be <br />affected by the potential for construction activity within a few hundred feet on the <br />Paydarfar site. <br />Review of Current Conditions and Circumstances: <br />• The BOCC has two (possibly three) alternative sites remaining for a solid waste transfer <br />station, all equally charged with concern from the affected communities. <br />• The Hwy 54 site is ready to move forward given an affirmative decision by the BOCC. <br />• The BOCC must wait for an official offer from the Town of Chapel Hill on the town owned <br />site in order to proceed further. <br />• The City of Durham transfer station (subject to the approval of the Durham City Council) <br />appears to be a viable option, but does come at a higher actual financial and <br />environmental impact due to its location and haul costs from Orange County. <br />• The County owned 10 acre site is a viable option within the County's control part but <br />comes with similar objections as those posed for the Chapel Hill town owned site, except <br />there are no adjacent homeowners. <br />• The remaining projected capacity at the current landfill will be exhausted, under best <br />management practices, on Eubanks Road is approximately Summer 2012. <br />• The need for a transfer station within the county limits remains a reality, notwithstanding <br />meticulous review and debate over alternatives; i.e. out -of- county location, alternative <br />technologies, private haulers. <br />• The solid waste transfer site selection process, re- opened in December 2007 with the <br />engagement of Olver, Inc., has been publicly addressed by the BOCC on the basis of <br />extensive technical research and infused with substantial community participation over a <br />period approaching 2 years. <br />• Orange County government through the Solid Waste Management Enterprise Fund has <br />expended $452,223 for all work, meetings, reports, specialty subcontractors, and certain <br />fees related TS site search (January 2008 to Present). <br />• The BOCC has previously agreed to the creation of a Community Advisory Group to be <br />engaged with Solid Waste management and the chosen engineering group to provide a <br />conduit for information, communications and dialogue regarding the development and <br />implementation of a state -of- the -art facility in the spirit of mitigating to the greatest extent <br />practical any adverse impacts. <br />Summary <br />The County has spent several years and several hundred thousand dollars pursuing a resolution <br />as to how to handle solid waste disposal once the county landfill closes. Time is running out. <br />Ultimately any site selected has its negative consequences, either perceived or real. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.