Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-01-2009 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 09-01-2009
>
Agenda - 09-01-2009 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 12:36:46 PM
Creation date
8/28/2009 4:23:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/1/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20090901
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
RES-2009-065 Reimbursement Resolution - Solid Waste Transfer Station Project
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
217
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br />Chair and previous County Manager. The most recent meeting dealt in more detail and was <br />overall positive in nature. <br />There are positives and negatives to this option for Orange County and the current users of the <br />County's landfill. Most of those elements focus on economics associated with the distance to <br />the Durham Transfer Station. Beyond those issues and without detailing them, it does appear <br />that the City of Durham may be willing to accept solid waste from Orange County both on a <br />short term and long term basis. Orange County is to send a letter to the Mayor and Manager <br />asking the item to be considered by the Durham City Council. <br />The City of Durham now accepts waste from anyone delivering it to their transfer station. The <br />waste is ultimately disposed of in Virginia. Orange County would be about 10% of the current <br />volume of waste going through the Durham transfer station. The City has plans to improve their <br />current operations. Orange County's request for consideration could encourage the City to move <br />forward its plans to improve the transfer station. <br />Alternative County Owned Property off Millhouse Road for Consideration <br />In December 2006, the County Commission approved the purchase of a 10 acre tract of land <br />known at that time as the Paydarfar property. The purchase ($191,172) was paid for using 2001 <br />Park and Open Space Bond funds. The land is located adjacent to and north of the old county <br />landfill off Millhouse Road. It is surrounded on all sides by either the county landfill property to <br />the south, the county future park property to the north and a small parcel owned by the Town of <br />Chapel Hill between the property and the railroad, just west of Millhouse Road. <br />This parcel was never considered as part of the original search process because it was smaller <br />than the minimum 25 acre requirement. Preliminary knowledge of the tract offers no serious <br />environmental obstacles to consideration. <br />There are elements that do impact consideration of this site: <br />(1) Reimbursement of the Park and Open Space fund for the value of the land (the property <br />was not a portion of the original adjacent park purchase. ($191,172) <br />(2) It does lie within the Rural Buffer area. <br />(3) The Joint Planning Area (JPA) Land Use Plan (LUP) modification would need the <br />approval and involvement of the County and the Town of Chapel Hill, if public water and <br />sewer is decided to be necessary <br />(4) The site could function with a well and septic tank system. However, public water and <br />sewer is nearby but its extension would require an amendment to the Water and Sewer <br />Boundary Agreement, as follow up to item 3 above. <br />(5) There could be a requirement to signalize of the railroad crossing located near the parcel. <br />(6) DOT approval of access to the site might require roadway improvements especially <br />considering the railroad crossing location. <br />(7) The location has no adjoining non - governmental uses. <br />(8) Environmental Resources and Conservation Department (ERCD) contemplates using a <br />well on the Paydarfar property as one of ten in its Observation Well Network per budget <br />discussions in June. Losing this well would mean one less hydro - geologic unit coverage <br />of locations and one less bedrock geologic unit. Further technical review is needed to <br />determine whether in fact this well would be eliminated. <br />(9) The BOCC has authorized bringing forward a lease of the nearby 6823 Millhouse Road <br />house on the Blackwood property. Repairs are underway and ERCD is pursuing a one- <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.