Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-01-2009 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 09-01-2009
>
Agenda - 09-01-2009 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 12:36:46 PM
Creation date
8/28/2009 4:23:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/1/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20090901
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
RES-2009-065 Reimbursement Resolution - Solid Waste Transfer Station Project
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
217
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fes': Considerations ire: Transfer Station Work Session <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />*Ire 1 981 results of preliminary soil tests throughout the property led the environmental health <br />department to conclude: <br />"The potential for development of that particular property using subsurface ground <br />absorption sewage disposal systems would seem highly unfeasible because of the severely <br />limited conditions. " <br />I'd also like to inquire about the term 'enhanced environmental assessment" on the agenda for tonight's <br />work session. Please specify whether county staff are currently developing an environmental impact statement <br />(EIS) as described in the attached orange County Environmental Impact Planning ordinances, a process which <br />examines potential impacts and alternatives in greater detail than an environmental assessment (EA). County, <br />state and federal laves define an EA and EIS, but I have not found any references to or definitions of an <br />..enhanced" EA. My understanding is that the county has completed the EA of Site 056, except for a wetlands <br />survey by the Army Corps of Engineers, <br />At the April 21st BOCC ,meeting, Commissioner Barry Jacobs commented that the county should be 'held to <br />the sane standards it would apply to any other project applicant. There was discussion of requiring an EIS and <br />following the meeting, I contacted Barry to clarify what had been agreed upon. He confirmed that the <br />commissioners directed staff to pursue the equivalent of an EIS, because staff indicated that some of the work <br />toward an EIS was already underway or completed. <br />A completed EIS would provide citizens with a full account of potential impacts of the proposed transfer <br />station on the property and surrounding community. Under the county ordinance, EIS requirements include a <br />public hearing, a completed EA document, a full exploration of alternatives with a description of direct and <br />indirect effects and consequences of the proposed activity, and a description of possible conflicts with federal, <br />state and local plans, policies and controls for the affected area. <br />,Tease note Orange County's EIS requirements in excerpted sections below from the attached document: <br />Chapter 40 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT <br />Sec, 40 -1, Purpose; Intent, <br />(b) The intent of this chapter is to provide a mechanism for full disclosure of <br />anticipated impacts of developments and to ,Hake such information publicly available <br />so that citizens of the county may have input into developmental issues before they <br />become moot. <br />Sec. 40-3, Applicabi it * <br />The county reserves the right to rewire preparation of an EIS pursuant to this subsection <br />(c),, notwithstanding a FONSI on the part of federal or state agencies. <br />Sec, 40 -4., Revlaew of environmental documents. <br />(b) Review of EI + <br />(3) Upon completion: of the advertised 15 -day review period, and upon <br />receipt of comments from the state clearinghouse when applicable, all <br />comments will be compiled and summarized by planning staff. <br />(4) The EIS, along with all comments received during the review <br />period, shall be presented for public hearing concurrently with the <br />development project. If a public hearing before the board of <br />commissioners is not rewired for approval of the development project, <br />a special hearing may be scheduled. The hearing shall take place no <br />05/14/2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.