Orange County NC Website
ORANGE COUNTY <br />ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT <br />MEMORANDUM <br />To: Rob�r� Davi s, Current Planning Supervisor <br />From : Rich Shaw, Land Conservation Manager <br />Dale: March 31, 2009 <br />Re: Environmental Assessment for Proposed Solid Wane Transfer Station <br />Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Environmental Assessment of <br />a site being considered for the proposed orange county Solid Waste Transfer Station. The <br />Environmental Assessment February 009 was conducted for Site 056, which ch i s comprised <br />of two adjacent parcels (151 acres total) located on the north side of NC 54, approximately <br />1,.500 feet west of the intersection of NC 54 and Orange Grove Road, <br />The Environmental Assessment (EA) provides an excellent overvie r of the propel and its <br />known environmental and historic/archaeological resources. The EA points out, however, <br />that three additional surveys of the property have yet to be conducted: a) wetlands <br />delineation, b flora and fauna survey, -and c Historic value survey. <br />a) Wetlands — the EA states the proposed development will not disturb streams <br />that were identified by the orange County Erosion control Division (page 14)# But the <br />Erosion control Division also noted in its findings that there are several isolated pools <br />located in the southeastern part of the property that drain to an identified stream* The <br />County staff advised that those pools could be wetlands and should be evaluated by the US <br />Army corps of Engineers (USACOE). some of those pools are clearly visible on aerial photos <br />of the property contained in the EA report. The EA states "Fallow up with the USACOE <br />regarding isolated pools located ire the parcel 111arr1 riorarsri� <br />However, construction is not planned to impact the area referenced by the County Staff as <br />requIrIng USACOE input "' It appears that the access road to the transfer station identified <br />on Exhibit A would cross through the area with possible wetlands. It's likely at the <br />facilities could be designed to avoid the wetlands, but ERCD feels the wetland sure is <br />needed before one should conclude that the development would not affect the wetlands. <br />b) Flom and Fanny — the EA identifies a number of significant plants and animals <br />known to exist in the white cross area based on inventories maintained by the NC Natural <br />Heritage Program. No such species of plants or animals are known to exist on the subject <br />property. The EA states on Page 9 "A site-spedflc flora and fauna survey will be conducted <br />on the site prior to acqursrtion... ", and on Page 10 " The fora and fauna survey will allow the <br />County to determine whether impacts from the construction and operation of a solid waste <br />transfer station at this site will si niricantl affect tft� wildlife and natural vegetation or the <br />site." ERCD concurs Frith that find[ a rid recommends that the planned surge include <br />streams that could be affected b y the proposed development, i ncludi nq,, tributaries of Collins <br />Creek a do nstrearn orfion of which is a desicinated Natural Herita a Area known to <br />support federally and state listed-species Haw River Aquatic Habitat . <br />Environment and Resource Conservation <br />PQ Box 8 18 1 / 306-A Re vere Road <br />Hillsborough, NC 27278 <br />( 1 ) 245 -2590 <br />