Browse
Search
Minutes - 20090514
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Minutes - 20090514
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2016 10:50:27 AM
Creation date
8/19/2009 2:51:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/14/2009
Meeting Type
Municipalities
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda 05-14-2009
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2009\Agenda - 05-14-2009
Agenda 05-14-2009 - 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2009\Agenda - 05-14-2009
Agenda 05-14-2009 - 2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2009\Agenda - 05-14-2009
Agenda 05-14-2009 - Report
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2009\Agenda - 05-14-2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- Based upon the most recent landfill capacity survey and if the transfer station is <br /> operational by March 1, 2012, approximately four months (18,300 tons) of capacity <br /> would remain with no additional diversion beyond UNC's waste. <br /> Diversion has the potential to increase the remaining disposal capacity of the landfill (over the <br /> remaining capacity at the point in time the transfer station is placed in service) from 250 percent <br /> to 150 percent depending upon when diversion of waste is actually initiated. <br /> The two major components of preserving landfill capacity are the diversion of waste prior to <br /> completion of the transfer station and a significant reduction in the landfill acceptance rate once <br /> the transfer station is in service. <br /> Financial Impacts of Preserving Landfill Capacity: <br /> - The County would see a reduction in tipping fee revenue of approximately <br /> $37,400/month during the period of diversion. <br /> - The loss in revenue would be recovered in the future as the preserved capacity is <br /> utilized. <br /> - Haulers of diverted waste may incur additional costs until the transfer station is <br /> operational. <br /> Summary of Findings and Conclusions: <br /> Based on preliminary discussions with DENR and current solid waste rules and <br /> regulations, it appears that preserving landfill capacity can be accomplished provided <br /> that the County continues to follow its approved Operating Plan for the landfill. In order <br /> to comply with the requirements of the Operating Plan, the County must continue <br /> operating the facility essentially as it is today, which includes maintaining equipment and <br /> managing the site on a daily basis — i.e., control of surface water, erosion control, <br /> environmental monitoring, odor and vector control, etc. The County would also have to <br /> continue to comply with reporting requirements, payment of annual fees, disposal tax, <br /> and applying for permit renewals as required. <br /> Mayor Foy arrived at 7:50 PM. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs asked where the 17% would be diverted to and Gayle Wilson said <br /> that it would be various private hauling companies and various businesses or citizens that haul <br /> directly to the landfill. Most of the 17% is public waste, Waste Industries, or Waste <br /> Management. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs asked about the potential for Hillsborough to go to Durham and <br /> how this affects the calculation. Gayle Wilson said that there would be some impact on the <br /> capacity, but only months and not years. <br /> Mayor Stevens said that the current site is significantly less expensive for Hillsborough <br /> than the Durham site. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said that he has lived in places where there are huge garbage <br /> mountains and he asked why the waste in the landfill could not go up instead of staying flat. <br /> Gayle Wilson said that it is a function of geometry and there is only a certain footprint available <br /> in which to bury waste. To maintain the State required slope percentages, it dictates how high <br /> the waste can be. <br /> The County Commissioners asked clarifying questions on the costs, which were <br /> answered by Bob Sallach. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.