Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-24-2009 - E1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 08-24-2009
>
Agenda - 08-24-2009 - E1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 12:15:30 PM
Creation date
8/19/2009 11:34:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/24/2009
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
E1
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20090824
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT 32 <br />Attachment 6 <br />532 Brian Crawford: We still need someone out there to push this forward. <br />533 <br />534 Jeffrey Schmitt: I agree. <br />535 <br />536 Larry Wright: Aren't the Board of County Commissioners the driving force? And the County Manager? <br />537 <br />538 Mary Bobbitt- Cooke: When I was recruited to be on this Board, I was told this is time for us to implement. <br />539 <br />540 Brian Crawford: I would rather be shot down than for the Board of County Commissioners to say "no that is not within your <br />541 purview", rather than we not do anything. <br />542 <br />543 Jeffrey Schmitt: I absolutely agree. <br />544 <br />545 Brian Crawford: What I heard from Tom is that when you come staff will give us some ideas. They have the plan in front of <br />546 them. We can say that sounds good, let's use the Strategy Initiative Form and ask the Housing Board to work on this. That may <br />547 be something they already want to work on but at least we know we are looking at the plan comprehensively and we know we <br />548 have 2030 down the road and we would like to move it along. <br />549 <br />550 Craig Benedict: The colored form that talked about project, the first column, "2009 -2010 BOCC Priorities" with a number by each <br />551 one. Those are priorities the Board of County Commissioners had in front of them in the budget session this year and had . <br />552 determined that is what they want us to do. <br />553 <br />554 Brian Crawford: Are those parts of the Comprehensive Plan? <br />555 <br />556 Craig Benedict: Some of them, like Intergovernmental Coordination, yes, to work with your local governments and develop a <br />557 joint planning area agreement. This is our marching orders as much as we can do. One of them is doing a UDO framework so <br />558 that is a priority and try to implement a Small Area Plan. Even though we were just finishing a Comprehensive Plan update and <br />559 they were in the middle of the budget process, we tried to say let's get these things out of the way. I think there will be a new list <br />560 each year. <br />561 <br />562 Brian Crawford: All these documents we have worked on, it should be a minimum mission of every Planning Board member that <br />563 is here is to make sure those documents continue to move. We have spent so much time on the plans. <br />564 <br />565 Earl McKee: That is what drove my original questions. I knew there had not been a lot of work and a lot of work to be done and <br />566 when I see this and not as many people, I could not figure out how we could do this much work with this many people, even with <br />567 a full staff. <br />568 <br />569 Perdita Holtz: In some of those colors, the yellow, the salmon and the fuchsia, identify those projects that will be delayed or not <br />570 even worked on if we are not able to rehire staff. <br />571 <br />572 Earl McKee: I had no idea how much had been done but I knew that would be a long way to go. Is this process at the <br />573 beginning, the middle and the end? <br />574 <br />575 Craig Benedict: One thing about the Unified Development Ordinance, it is important because that will be the framework on <br />576 development we hang all these implementation ideas from the Small Area Plans and new process and standards. <br />577 <br />578 Peter Hallenbeck: I want to try to summarize just to make sure I have it correct. There has been a deferred maintenance on the <br />579 existing codes and plans in anticipation of the Small Area Plans and the UDO over the past few years. You now have public <br />580 input and the details are ready to be worked out and you find yourself with staff reductions that will delay getting the Small Area <br />581 Plans and the UDO going. It seems the delay of those plans will affect how the economic recovery, when it comes, happens <br />582 because we will have poor execution of construction because of old plans or projects delayed because you don't have the UDO <br />583 and these new and united plans and codes are important to overcoming this perception that Orange County is against all growth. <br />584 So Orange County could miss out on this inevitable recovery unless the Small Area Plans and UDOs are updated in a timely <br />585 manner and your timeframes show that this could happen by mid -2010 which is roughly one year and that deadline is pretty <br />586 important if you want to try get in on the new priority list and the new development. When I look at that I agree because I don't <br />587 want to be sitting here at Orange County a year from now and everyone says, we have money coming back, Durham and <br />588 Alamance, let's stay out of Orange that is nothing but trouble. Seeing all that, it seems that has to wait from your perspective. 1 <br />589 don't see how you can take that plan and put a whole lot of time into it when the focus should be getting the Small Area Plans <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.