Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-24-2009-C2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 08-24-2009
>
Agenda - 08-24-2009-C2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 12:16:26 PM
Creation date
8/19/2009 11:32:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/24/2009
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C2
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20090824
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STRATEGIC GROWTH AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION PROGRAM <br />Final (8.7.2009) <br />If the subdivision is classified as a "Minor" subdivision type in Table 2 -3, then it may be <br />eligible for an optional two -step review process: concept plan - final plat submittals <br />followed by administrative review only. A "Major Rural" subdivision review may follow a <br />pre - application conference / concept plan review process followed by a Planning <br />Board review. A preliminary plat would then be submitted for Planning Board and Board <br />of County Commissioners review; if approved, the developer would then submit a final <br />plat for recordation. <br />Commercial developments typically undergo a slightly less lengthy process, notably <br />omitting the Neighborhood Meeting requirements, but are still required to be presented <br />at a quarterly public hearing for official comments. Commercial sites using the <br />Economic Development District (EDD) designation would also be required to adhere to <br />the EDD Design Manual specifications, which may be somewhat more costly and time <br />consuming to meet. <br />This entire process is likely to take 12 to 15 months or longer, depending on the <br />preparedness of the developer and his familiarity with the planning process; the <br />complexity / controversial nature of the proposed development action; and how the <br />timing of the proposal effort aligns with the required meeting schedule (particularly the <br />quarterly public hearing meeting). This planning process, while extensive, helps to <br />ensure that adequate public review of proposals are conducted at a level that Orange <br />County feels is commensurate with the potential impact of the proposed development <br />action. <br />2.3.2 SGRC Planning Process and Agency / Participant Responsibilities <br />The SGRC Program would influence the development review process at several levels. <br />The developer and staff would want to know, for example, how SGRC credits would <br />influence the site yield or if bonus credits could be accommodated. Perhaps most <br />significantly is the negotiation process between the developer and Resource <br />Conservation Area participant to reach an agreed -upon price for the conservation <br />credits. <br />The flow diagrams on the following pages (Tables 2 -4 and 2 -5) illustrate the planning <br />process in a step -by -step fashion for both residential and commercial (EDD) <br />development types highlighting actions led by the developer (red text) and Orange <br />County staff (green text). Additionally, a pre- review process involving a hypothetical <br />Resource Conservation Area participant is demonstrated (blue text); and, at the end, <br />the annual performance report described more fully in Chapter 3 is summarized (purple <br />text). Any task in the flow diagram that is required uniquely as a part of the SGRC <br />Program is in bold text. <br />ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.