Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-24-2009-C2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 08-24-2009
>
Agenda - 08-24-2009-C2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 12:16:26 PM
Creation date
8/19/2009 11:32:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/24/2009
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C2
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20090824
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STRATEGIC GROWTH AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION PROGRAM <br />Final (8.7,2009) <br />Submittal to Orange County Planning Staff. The final SGRC recommendations as <br />presented in this report were submitted to the Orange County Planning Staff in March, <br />2008. <br />2.2.2 Economic Analysis <br />A successful SGRC Program needs to "balance" potential sending area credits and <br />receiving area credits in order to ensure that the amount that a developer is willing to <br />pay for a receiving area credit is comparable to the amount that a sending area land <br />owner would be willing to accept for his development rights. Moreover, the density <br />bonus achieved by using SGRC credits must make economic sense to developers, or <br />they simply won't participate in the program. This section will address directly the <br />assumption made previously that a density bonus in Orange County will be beneficial <br />to a developer and will quantify the willingness of developers to pay for additional units <br />of density. This analysis forms the basis of a later section focusing on achieving the <br />balance of credits. <br />Characteristics of Recent Residential Development in Orange County. In determining <br />how much developers may be willing to pay for density bonuses under the SGRC <br />Program, we first needed to characterize recent development trends in terms of <br />location, density and value. Understanding trends in recent development will assist in <br />predicting how the housing market in Orange County will affect SGRC transactions by <br />focusing on only the most relevant, recent transactions. "Recent development" is <br />defined as parcels within Orange County (excluding municipalities and municipal extra- <br />territorial jurisdiction (ETJ)) that have been built upon from January, 2004 through <br />February, 2007. This analysis focuses on residential development because data are not <br />readily available for the few commercial transactions that exist. <br />Location. Of the 916 parcels recently developed in unincorporated Orange County, <br />about half are located in "near- urban" areas. Near -urban areas were defined as those <br />within two miles of a municipal or ETJ boundary, as illustrated in Figure 2 -1. The fact that <br />the recently developed parcels are split between the two areas, even though the near - <br />urban area is less than one third the size of the rural area, simply confirms that <br />development in the proximity of urban areas is more attractive to developers and <br />home buyers. Existing demand for housing in the near -urban areas is critical to the <br />success of the SGRC Program. The distinction between near -urban and rural areas is <br />important because the housing markets in near -urban and rural areas are quite <br />different - the type and density of housing built, the price of land, and even the <br />demographics of those who live in the different areas. In addition, using near -urban <br />and rural areas in analyzing housing trends is a helpful proxy for receiving and sending <br />areas, respectively. <br />ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.