Orange County NC Website
students. Why does Chapel Hill ask for less than Orange County and still get 30% more <br />in local funding? Because it has a district tax. But you don't understand the impact of <br />that district tax is to drive down the per pupil amount available for Orange County. It's a <br />flawed funding mechanism and it needs to be changed. And the change needs to be <br />permanent. It can't simply be a campaign promise. I wish it could be, but so far, that <br />hasn't worked. Over the next ten years, Chapel Hill will need to spend $100 million on <br />new buildings. Why should Orange County residents have to pay for their rampant <br />growth? We need to fix the mechanism. Would a district tax do it? We don't have the <br />20% commercial base that Chapel Hill and Carrboro have. When you get taxed 20 <br />cents, you really are paying 16 cents. And because we're in the same County we will <br />always have to pay catch up based on that district tax in the larger Chapel Hill district. <br />It's important to note that in your presentation tonight you neglected to say that the <br />three-year, five-year, and ten-year scenarios also work in a merged system. It's on <br />page 24 of your report. Sure, we could remain separate but collaborative; each student <br />still carrying his or her small prejudice in their pocket, secure in their particular culture. <br />But what would we be teaching our children? I'll end it. Isn't it time to stop asking how <br />can we fund these systems and instead ask how can we serve every child? Thank you. <br />Ann Hill: My name is Ann Hill. I have three children in the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City <br />School district. I also have friends that have kids in the County school district. I would <br />be glad to have my children go to either one, from what I know of them. I've had the <br />pleasure to meet members of both school boards who do not feel that merger is a good <br />idea. I did go to the last merger meeting where Keith Cook had some excellent <br />information about the merger. I do feel that both systems can collaborate much better. <br />I look forward to working with that. I get very concerned about the tax burden that this <br />might put on people. I know that the County people have a lot more people that do not <br />have children, and I think that's reflected in how they do vote for the taxes. I would ask <br />that you look at all alternatives before voting on the merger. I also ask you to look at the <br />different outcomes that would happen. One thing I've not heard tonight is that if this <br />merger does go through, what would be the expected growth in the County. We have <br />been feeling this in the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City School district and have been dealing <br />with this for the last ten years that I've been here. What would that growth be? I would <br />ask you to get those projections out to us. That will play a part, especially on the <br />County students, but on the whole County as a whole. The other question that I haven't <br />seen that I ask you is when is this vote going to take place? I've seen all the public <br />hearings, but I don't know when you're actually going to vote on that. Those are my two <br />questions for you tonight. I really worry for the children about the growth that would <br />come to the County students. I think that that impact has not been even stated or felt. <br />And as a constituent, I would say that we don't have enough information to vote on this <br />yet, to really slow it down, and lick it. I'm not saying one way or another whether it's <br />good or bad, but I think there needs to be more options, especially that growth. After <br />living with it in Chapel Hill, it needs to be looked at. And let's support the children and <br />teachers in the community in the most economical way possible. Thank you. <br />