Browse
Search
Minutes - 20071207
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2007
>
Minutes - 20071207
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2009 4:23:59 PM
Creation date
8/13/2009 4:21:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/7/2007
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Foushee asked about the criteria used to address environmental justice <br />concerns or considerations. Jeff Crate said that they would work with the Board of County <br />Commissioners and they may have recommendations, but it is what the Board wants that gets <br />factored in. He said that the important thing is to always remain objective with ample <br />opportunities for effective public input. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked how important it was to locate a transfer station near the <br />center of waste generation. Jeff Crate said that Chapel Hill is the major population center. <br />From a carbon footprint standpoint, if the transfer station were located far west of the County, <br />the street collection vehicles would have to be modified since it would take longer to get to the <br />transfer station. He thinks that this issue should weigh in heavily. <br />Lynn Klappich said that the further you are from your waste, the less control you have <br />over how the waste gets there. She is in favor of placing the facility closer to the waste <br />generation, but it may not be important to the Board because of other factors. <br />Chair Carey made reference to the use of numerical criteria for screening/siting versus <br />general criteria for screening/siting and asked about the public's perspective on the general <br />criteria. <br />Lynn Klappich said that she has done it both ways and numerical causes more <br />questions. She said that this process is only as good as the group is clear. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked the question, "How critical is having public water and <br />sewer available. If critical, what are the implications/consequences of not having it? and, If the <br />preferred site(s) are located where public water and sewer are not available, how <br />(measures/mechanisms) will the transfer station obtain water pressure necessary for effective <br />wash down? Environmentally sound waste water treatment?" Lynn Klappich said that public <br />water and sewer is nice, but it is not absolutely critical. Sewer is more troublesome than water <br />because it must be treated, and a septic system is not the appropriate treatment facility. It really <br />should go to a larger wastewater treatment facility. Sewer is the preferred utility. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked how many gallons per minute would be needed from a <br />well. Lynn Klappich said 20-25 gallons/minute. Commissioner Gordon asked about fire <br />protection and Lynn Klappich said that, to date, all of the transfer stations Draper Aden has <br />done, because of the codes of the counties, have not required fire protection because the waste <br />is not there. If the code requires fire suppression, it would have to be 500 gallons/minute. This <br />creates a huge situation, but her background has not required fire suppression. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked about the definition of environmental justice and Jeff Crate <br />said that there is an executive order and it is in Draper Aden's policy. He said that all things <br />need to be equally evaluated and they want to promote the feedback of all citizens that may be <br />affected. <br />BOCC Debrief and Discussion/Lunch <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked that the Board discuss strengths and weaknesses of both <br />firms. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that the strength of the Olver firm was that they were clear, <br />and the Draper firm was not as clear. She appreciated the Draper firm doing research on <br />Orange County. She said that Draper had good criteria, but Olver has a better understanding of <br />the water issues. She thinks that the County could work with either firm. <br />Commissioner Foushee agreed with Commissioner Gordon and said that the firms <br />prepared differently, and the presentation by Olver was much more clear. She thought that <br />Draper was not prepared to answer the follow up questions like Olver was. <br />Commissioner Nelson said that either one of the firms would do a fine job. He said that <br />he thought that the Draper firm explained terms better such as the "fatal flaw" wording. <br />Regarding Olver, he has had a chance to work with Bob Sallach, and he really likes him. In <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.