Minutes - 20041005 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Rich Shaw said that he got advice from the Conservation Trust of North Carolina. He said that the language in this forest management section is more detailed and rigorous than other conservation easements of this kind. They refined it even further with the County Attorney and OWASA to make it even more specific with regard to no crossing of streams and entering into wetlands, etc. Even with the language, he agrees that it should be flagged for a little more conscious oversight. Commissioner Halkiotis asked if the County could have prior notification of any cutting and if representatives from the County or OWASA could be present during the cutting. Geof Gledhill said that this could be done. He made reference to page 20 and that the forest management activities must be in accordance with the written forest management plan prepared by a professional forester and approved by the grantee. Orange County and OWASA are the grantees. Commissioner Halkiotis said that he cannot support this because he is not comfortable with it. Chair Jacobs said that if the County is going to be involved, then it should model the behavior that it has been advocating. For instance, the County has been advocating that notice be given to neighbors prior to forestry cutting practices. He asked if this was stipulated anywhere in the agreement and Rich Shaw said no. Chair Jacobs asked if there was something in the agreement about leaving visual buffers and not cutting right up to property lines. Rich Shaw said that on page 20-i., it speaks to aesthetic and recreational considerations, including impacts on views from public roads. Chair Jacobs said that the Board has talked about establishing a mechanism for neighbors to buy timber rights to an easement or buffer along the property line. He would like to work toward this. If the staff could work on interpreting the agreement along those lines, he would feel more comfortable. Commissioner Gordon said that it sounds like more work should be done on this before it is approved. She applauds the owners for their honesty. She thinks the Board should direct the staff to be more descriptive in the language so that the forest management plan details are not left to be negotiated later. The Board agreed that the staff would come back as soon as possible with a modified agreement that reflects the comments made. Commissioner Carey asked about OWASA's action on this and Rich Shaw said that they have approved the purchase contract, but not the conservation easement language. Chair Jacobs said that they appreciate the Lloyd's willingness to work with the County in putting their property into a conservation easement. e. Resolution to Amend the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement Establishing the Orange-Person-Chatham Local Management Entity (LME) The Board considered a resolution that amends the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement (ICA) that established the three-county public entity to serve as the Local Management Entity (LME) for ensuring mental health, developmental disability, and substance abuse services (MH/DD/SA) in the Orange, Person, and Chatham Counties catchment area. John Link said that this amendment allows the three counties to effectively deconstruct the OPC area authority and construct the LME. The statutory language is very restrictive. The amendment gives the flexibility to carry out the process in a prudent and measured way. Commissioner Brown said that this is the most important thing the County has done since the State mandated how they had to get rid of most of their programs. This amendment allows the County to continue services as Orange County government until an agency can come forward to provide the same quality of services.