Minutes - 19770804 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

ry ,- - cS v Commissioner Gustaveson stated that the first function of the Advisory Council is to assess the recreational needs of the County, This mould define those areas which lack recreation in the County and then develop ideas to provide recreation for those areas. Mr. Strayhorn stated that he felt the recreation program was a means of drawing the County closer together, however, he feels the County is going .in the wrong direction when it speaks of percentages and amounts of monies. He added he flet monies should be placed into accounts for future development of park areas. Further, he stated that recreation should be a community spirited effort. Commissioner Gustaveson stated he felt the inequity problem is a problem which the County must learn to live with. The County should attempt to work and build a recreation program in relation to the pro- blems which exist. Ann Barnes, who had served an a study commission for recreation in the County, stated that the Commission's recommendation to the County was twofold. 1) To begin programming in recreation, basically in the Northern Orange County area, and 2) to begin immediately to identify parcel of land and to put aside seed monies to get matching monies to acquire parkland in the County. Chairman Whitted asked those present to proceed to discuss a permanent Recreation Council or Commission. He stated that the group needed to dis- cuss areas in the County where programs are needed. He recognized that parkland needed to be identified and to determine the best ways to utilize such areas. Mr. Strayhorn stated that after discussion, the Advisory Council had concluded that they would be more comfortable opening as an Advisory Council in Orange County rather than a Commission. The Recreation Director has prepared a rough draft Ordinance which does need further consideration. The Advisory Council needs direction fror- the County Commissioners of how to proceed. Mr. Strayhorn stated that he was hopeful that the instructions would be to proceed with the stated charge. He spoke of the membership of the Advisory Council. He asked if the Council should consist of the idential make-up as originally chosen? Should the Advisory Council make recommendations to the Commissioners for membership? Ms. Sockwell suggested that a County Commissioner be a member of the Advisory Council. Tt was pointed out that commissioners are hindered from attending the Advisory Council's meetings since the Council meets the same night as the regularly scheduled meeting of the Commissioners. Ms. Sockwell suggested that the Advisory Council change their meeting night. Further, it was requested that all County Commissioners be supplied with minutes of the Advisory Council meetings. Mr. Giles stated that he felt there needed to be a more forrmal method of communication between the County and the two Boards of Aldermen. He also spoke of the need for cooperation between the recreation departments in the County and recreation committees throughout the County. Commissioner Gustaveson asked the Advisory Council how they views[? themselves as an Advisorv Council. Mr. Giles stated that he did not feel that he had been useful. Other members of the Council stated they felt the Advisory Council _ was the best way of assessing needs and developing recreational. programs for the County. In reply to a question from one member of the Advisory Council, Mx. ~Thitted stated that he would like to see the Council spend more time lookinc at the parks need in the County. Emphasis in this direction is the way to proceed.