Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-01-1998 - 10b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Agenda - 12-01-1998
>
Agenda - 12-01-1998 - 10b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2013 2:08:49 PM
Creation date
8/10/2009 12:27:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/1/1998
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
10b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19981201
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Technical Report lb <br />Detailed calculations of the capital improvement cost associated with each dwelling unit are <br />presented in Table 8. The costs per dwelling unit are indicative of what impact fees for public <br />school facilities would be before any adjustments are made. <br />PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF CAPITAL COSTS <br />The standard to which impact fees will be held is that the fees not exceed a proportionate share of <br />the costs that local government will incur to accommodate new development. Normally, new <br />development will pay towards capital improvements in the form of general taxation, debt service, <br />and other payments. The task is to calculate how much of capital costs are covered by these <br />payments. Whatever is not paid could be charged as impact fees. <br />Among those factors which should be considered in establishing a proportionate share of capital <br />costs are the following: <br />1. The cost of existing facilities; <br />2. The means by which existing facilities were financed; <br />3. The extent to which new development has already contributed to the cost of providing <br />existing facilities; <br />4. The extent to which new development will, in the future, contribute to the cost of <br />constructing existing facilities [through debt service or other payments]; <br />S. The extent to which new development should receive credit for providing facilities required <br />as a condition of development or construction approval; <br />6 Extraordinary costs in serving the new development, and <br />7. The time price differential inherent in fair comparisons of amounts paid at different times. <br />Payments by New Development Toward Capital Cost <br />To determine how capital improvements have been financed, the fiscal structuring of the <br />community must be examined. Each type of facility needs to be analyzed in terms of how it was <br />financed and also in terms of how new development will contribute toward capital finance in the <br />future. It would be unfair to require new development to pay some portion of either existing or <br />future capital improvements and also require them to be totally responsible for the capital <br />improvement costs that new development will need. Thus, a system of "credits" must be identified <br />which recognizes the extent to which to which new developments have already contributed to and <br />will pay for (in the future) the cost of existing capital improvements. <br />Property Tax Revenues. Bonds, whether general obligation or revenue, are commonly used to <br />finance infrastructure. Where general obligation bonds are used, the debt incurred by the approval <br />and issuance of such bonds is generally retired through the use of property tax revenues. For <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.