Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-01-1998 - 10b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Agenda - 12-01-1998
>
Agenda - 12-01-1998 - 10b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2013 2:08:49 PM
Creation date
8/10/2009 12:27:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/1/1998
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
10b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19981201
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Technical Report • 12 <br />averages" were calculated, including figures for the number of square feet of building and land area <br />per student, and compared to the adopted standards. The calculations are shown in Table 5. <br />As evidenced by the comparison, the adopted standards for building size exceed the "local <br />averages" in the elementary and middle school cases. Since new development cannot be required to <br />raise the level of service standard, "local averages" must be used in calculating impact fees. <br />DETERMINING THE COST OF ACCOMMODATING DEVELOPMENT <br />Once physical quantities are established, costs must be determined. The manner in which cost <br />information is obtained or expressed is an important factor in establishing standards because the <br />objective is first to determine capital improvement cost per unit of development and then determine <br />a proportionate share of those costs. It follows that standards, costs, and shares of costs must be in <br />consistent units. <br />The best source of this data are actual local records. Fortunately, such records for new school <br />construction in Orange County are available. The New Hope Elementary School opened in 1991, <br />the new A.L. Stanback Middle School in 1995, the McDougle Middle School in 1994, the <br />McDougle Elementary School in 1996, and the East Chapel Hill High School in 1996. Using cost <br />data for these projects as well as information from the N.C. Department of Public Instruction and <br />the architects of the School Boards, the School Facility Constructions Standards Work Group was <br />able to calculate the estimated cost of new elementary and middle schools. These costs and the <br />capital cost per student for each type of facility are shown in Table 6. Cost estimates for new high <br />school facilities are based on the construction costs for East Chapel Hill High School opened in <br />1996. <br />As noted previously, there were no long -range plans for the construction of a new high school in the <br />county in 1995, and the Work Group did not address high school facility standards. However, both <br />school districts have identified the need for additions to existing high school facilities during the <br />ten -year school improvement program period and Orange County has identified the need for a new <br />High School.. Classroom space for an additional 500 students as well as a cultural arts building and <br />auditorium, a second gymnasium, an infant and pre - school facility, and athletic facilities are needed <br />at the new East Chapel Hill High School by the year 2002. These facilities are needed to complete <br />sections of the school that were eliminated during initial construction. The estimated cost for these <br />additions and the capital cost per student are shown in Table 7. <br />Multiplying the service provision standards, per demand unit, by the capital cost per unit of service <br />establishes the capital improvement cost per unit of development. This also may be expressed as a <br />formula: <br />Total Cost = Needed Improvements x Cost Per Unit <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.