Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-08-1998 - 5c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Agenda - 12-08-1998
>
Agenda - 12-08-1998 - 5c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2015 3:39:34 PM
Creation date
8/7/2009 4:35:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/8/1998
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19981208
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
V. - Issues Related to Tax - exempt Properties. <br />If the Alternative Finance Committee were to recommend implementation of the Availability <br />Fee, the fee would also include an assessment against tax- exempt, developed properties within <br />Orange County. Because these properties are exempt from property taxes, the Orange County <br />Assessor does not have the requisite information on these properties for the needs of this study. <br />It would be necessary to conduct a field survey of tax- exempt properties to determine which of <br />those sites are developed and into what tier of the commercial properties' price structure each <br />should be placed. The inclusion of developed, tax- exempt properties would serve to lower the <br />availability fee levied against commercial and residential properties, but the amount of the lower <br />assessment cannot be established without first determining which of the tax- exempt properties <br />would be subject to an Availability Fee assessment. <br />A review of the owners of record of these tax- exempt properties reveals that of the total 1,630 <br />tax- exempt properties, 1,118 (or 68.6 %) are held by various local, state or national governmental <br />agencies, the University of North Carolina or Duke University. <br />VI. - Solid Waste Management Plan. <br />The implementation of the Solid Waste Management Plan is intended to reduce the amount of <br />waste to be landfilled. This reduction would reduce the waste disposal costs to the various <br />communities, and might also reduce the waste collection costs as well. <br />Waste disposal cost savings can be more readily estimated. based on per household generation <br />rates and the tonnage records from the last few years. Table 6 displays: <br />• C &D and MSW waste tonnage estimates under the proposed SWMP compared with a <br />recycling program which remains static (based on the FY 1998 program) throughout the <br />forecast period; <br />• the level of waste reduction which each jurisdiction might anticipate through implementation <br />of the SWMP; and <br />• estimated cost savings in tipping fees to each jurisdiction. <br />Estimates of the potential for savings in waste collection are far more arguable, because there is <br />no ready way to estimate savings from the several possible modifications in waste collection <br />methods: re- routing of collections, reduced collection crew size, reduced collection frequency, <br />etc. There is anecdotal evidence from several solid waste collection programs that there might <br />be ample opportunity for cost - savings, such as commercial waste dumpsters which are collected <br />twice each week but are nearly half- empty. However, no attempt has been made to estimate <br />potential collection cost savings through the implementation of the SWMP. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.