Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-08-1998 - 5c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Agenda - 12-08-1998
>
Agenda - 12-08-1998 - 5c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2015 3:39:34 PM
Creation date
8/7/2009 4:35:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/8/1998
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19981208
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C1 <br />• Over time, this method could result in individual jurisdictions, in order to reduce their <br />obligation, trying to negotiate reductions in services which would impact other components <br />of the Solid Waste system and potentially reduce the achievable solid waste reduction goals. <br />IV. - Availability Fee. <br />The use of an Availability Fee makes a direct connection between the level of service provided <br />or available to various waste generators and the cost that is assessed against them for that <br />service. The HDR report of October 20, 1998, titled "Alternative Financing Strategies for Solid <br />Waste Management Programs, Final Report", provides further information about availability <br />fees, and the staff memorandum of October 20th to the Committee, reviews how the concept <br />would translate to specific prices in Orange County. <br />Table 5 shows for each year of the forecast period, the recommended levels of Availability Fees, <br />the user base (current and projected number of beneficiaries) in each sector, and the total revenue <br />generated by each sector and total aggregate revenue. These availability fees would generate the <br />revenue required to fund the solid waste system cost not covered by tipping fees, including the <br />costs associated with the SWMP, and the level of funding that must be matched by any other <br />revenue tool that is being considered. Throughout the analysis presented here, the "stabilized" <br />availability fee is used as the benchmark for the revenue requirements of the waste reduction <br />programs. <br />The Availability Fee is shown in both the "actual" and "stabilized" form. The "stabilized' fee <br />has been modified to reduce the volatility from year to year. By charging a little more in a year <br />in which revenue needs are lower, it is possible to charge a little less in a year when revenue <br />needs are higher, easing both budgeting and public acceptance.. Graph 1 displays both the total <br />"actual" and total "stabilized" availability fees over time to show the effect of fee leveling from <br />year to year. <br />Groh 2 examines the effect of the various funding scenarios discussed here on the average <br />residential property owner (assessed value $140,000). In that graph, the majority of the <br />difference between the "Availability Fee" (top line) and the "County Tax Rate" (2" line), is <br />explained by the fact that the county tax rate would apply to non- developed properties, which <br />comprise nearly -7.5% of the total tax base, but which do not receive service under the SWMP. <br />This inclusion of undeveloped properties would lower the assessment against other beneficiaries. <br />Points for Discussion <br />• Because an Availability Fee relates to the level of services or benefits received, revenues to <br />support the SWMP are provided without consideration of "ability to pay;" therefore, waste <br />reduction and recycling services are addressed as any other utility service might be. . <br />• Availability Fees, unlike local taxes, are not deductible for purposes of federal income taxes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.