Agenda - 12-08-1998 - 5c - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

4w e14 -�- / To: Gavle Wilson From: Edward Pullan Date: June 29, 1998 Re: C&D Tickets from May 1998; and Construction and Demolition Waste Survey C &D Tickets from May.1998 A preliminary review of the C&D deliveries for the month of May, 1998 show that there had been 2,089 C&D deliveries to the landfill during the calendar month, the majority of those coming from smaller loads. Of 2,089 total C&D deliveries; 1,255 (60.1 %) were less than one -ton. In terms of the number of customers potentially impacted: 116 different landfill customers delivered C&D waste to the landfill during the month and 80 (69.0 0/6) has deliveries of 1-ton or less. The greatest number of small loads were received, not unexpectedly, from "Miscellaneous Cash Customer" and "Orange County." . Customer (Cult. Total Loads Less than 1 -ton Misc. Cash Customers (044) 908 662 (72.9 %) . Orange County (107) — .. 325 286 (88.0 %) . Other landfill accounts that appear likely to deliver smaller C&D loads include public agencies and smaller non- pr ofit organizations: -r ....... �.. - . . Customer (Cast. #fl Total Loads Less than 1-40n, Town of Chapel Hill '' 62 59 (95.2 %) Carrboro 21 12(57.1%) UNC and Hospital 42 19 (45.2 %) CH- Carrboro YMCA 4 4(100%) PTA Thrift Shop 5 4 (80.0 %) It would appear that the absence of a "local' C&D disposal facility would most heavily impact customers with smaller loads of C&D waste to dispose of, as the additional cost and distance to transport that waste to a distant facility would be most burdensome and add to their costs of oper4tions. Construction and Demolition Waste Survev A survey of all in- coming loads of C&D waste was conducted at the landfill between Friday and Tuesday (June 26'` to 30t'), consisting of the questions and possible responses outlined below. The responses to each question have been tabulated to show the raw number of each type of response and the percentage of particular responses to each question.