Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-08-1998 - 5c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Agenda - 12-08-1998
>
Agenda - 12-08-1998 - 5c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2015 3:39:34 PM
Creation date
8/7/2009 4:35:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/8/1998
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19981208
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
* Economic Development District - I- 85 /Buckhorn Road <br />- would result in additional transportation costs due to <br />distance from recyclable generation centers <br />- property probably more expensive that non -EDD options <br />(est. $20,000- $30,000 acre) <br />- would move a solid waste operation to a different <br />neighborhood <br />- development ordinance would need to be amended to allow <br />facility <br />- would not contribute to notion of integrating solid <br />waste facilities <br />* Economic Development District - I -40 /01d Highway 86 <br />- would result in additional transportation costs due to <br />distance from recyclable generation centers; however, <br />this EDD is the most convenient to the recyclable <br />waste generation centers of the three EDD's <br />- property probably more expensive that non -EDD options <br />(est. $20,000- $30,000 acre) <br />- would move a solid waste operation to a different <br />neighborhood <br />- development ordinance would need to be amended -to allow <br />facility <br />would not contribute to notion of integrating solid <br />waste facilities <br />* Economic Development District - I -85 /US Highway 70 <br />- would result in additional transportation costs due to <br />distance from recyclable generation centers <br />- property probably more expensive -that non -EDD options <br />(est. $20,000 - $30,000 acre) <br />- would move a solid waste operation' to a different <br />neighborhood <br />- development ordinance would need to be amended to allow <br />facility <br />- would not contribute to notion of integrating solid <br />waste facilities <br />* Eubanks Road site (3 parcels directly west of North Eubanks <br />Road landfill property) - Original Staff Recommendation <br />- would integrate into current operations <br />- continued impact to already impacted neighborhoods <br />- near recyclable generation centers, minimizing <br />transportation costs <br />- estimated moderate land cost (est. $13,000- $15,000 <br />acre) <br />- provides most flexibility for design and operation <br />- would require some use or threat of eminent domain for <br />one or;two of the three parcels <br />* Closed North Eubanks landfill (Agenda #10a) <br />- would integrate into current operations <br />- continued impact to already impacted neighborhoods <br />- near recyclable generation centers, minimizing <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.