Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-15-1998 - 9e
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Agenda - 12-15-1998
>
Agenda - 12-15-1998 - 9e
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2009 2:59:49 PM
Creation date
8/7/2009 2:59:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/15/1998
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9e
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19981215
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br />Presentations on alternative income sources in agriculture. Guidance is available from state and local <br />ag officials, and from individual farmers in Orange and neighboring counties, on successful alternative <br />business ventures in agriculture. Last spring's farm tour, sponsored by the Carolina Farm Stewardship <br />Association, included farms in Orange County that produce organic vegetables, prepared natural <br />foods, mushrooms, goat milk, soap, dairy products, and cut flowers. Such pursuits are attracting <br />growing attention within the mainstream agricultural community. The November issue of Cooperative <br />Farmer has a cover story on "Good Alternatives" that highlights wine grapes, aquaculture, rabbits, cut <br />flowers and market vegetables. The Farm Bureau News for September has a feature on the North <br />Carolina Herb Association and successful herb production. <br />2. Update on prospects for tobacco farmers. State and or/local officials can speak to the immediate <br />future of allotments and production; the status of negotiations with tobacco companies on a settlement <br />to help producers; and possible formats for astate-administered program to assist tobacco farmers in <br />turning to other crops. <br />3. County outreach. Orange County recently developed detailed information on the extent to which the <br />benefits of use-value taxation are realized. While sharing this information, farmers can be apprised a <br />tax office review is underway to assure qualifying practices remain in effect. The possibility that <br />tobacco allotments may be taxed by the county could be mentioned as well. The gathering would <br />provide a good opportunity to advance the outreach goals articulated in recent discussions involving <br />creation of the Environment and Resource Conservation Department. A presentation can be made on <br />how conservation easements work, along with testimonials from Jean Earnhardt and Bob Nutter, who <br />are enjoying the benefits of Farmers with concerns about county tax practices also can avail <br />themselves of the presence of John Smith to have their questions answered individually. <br />4. Rural Education Center. More than a decade has passed since the county livestock market closed and <br />a task force chaired by Steve Halkiotis met to discuss establishment of a Rural Education Center. As <br />originally envisioned, this facility was to include livestock scales still owned by the county, a farmer's <br />market, meeting space, and offices for all agriculture-related departments and services. Creation of the <br />ERC Department intensifies space demands on the building currently shared by Planning, Ag <br />Extension, Soil and Water Conservation, and Environmental Health. Rather than simply resurrect an <br />old idea, the county can ascertain if there is interest within the agricultural community in re-examining <br />the usefulness of a Rural Ed Center, and what services and functions might be included. <br />The Board of County Commissioners will not meet again for a month. Organizing a farm summit will <br />take time, as will publicizing the event. Farmers will increasingly be in the fields as spring approaches, <br />making it difficult to find a convenient date for a meeting. Therefore, with the consent of the Board of <br />Commissioners, staff could be directed to establish a work group to bring back to our meeting on January <br />19 a proposal for an Orange County Agricultural Summit along lines such as those outlined above. <br />Proposed membership in the work group would include a representative each from the Agricultural <br />Districts Advisory Board, the county extension service, the Economic Development Commission, the Soil <br />and Water Conservation board, and the Orange County and Chapel Hill-Carrboro Chambers of <br />Commerce. Representatives of several of those groups already have been approached regarding this <br />proposal, and reacted favorably. <br />RECOMMENDATION(S): That the Board support the concept of an Orange County Agricultural <br />Summit and instruct the Manager to meet with key agriculture-related department heads and staff to <br />develop a proposed charge, a proposed list of groups to be represented, and a list of potential topics for <br />discussion at a Summit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.