Orange County NC Website
..cam, -.�v «« v�� ,vw.+ uC I.dYYaOY -CJ fly `3-t'�23 7737 P.03 <br />Staff Report for Final Decision —JPA Amendments Page Z <br />JPA # Initiated By <br />Subject Staff Recommendation <br />Amend Ioint Planning Agreement to delete <br />reference to T -I and T -2 and provide a process to <br />approve a floating conditional use district. <br />3 -98 Town of <br />Amendment to JPA Land Use Plan and Map to Approval <br />Chapel Hill <br />incorporate the Chapel Hill Northwest Area plan. <br />1 -98 Irma Deng <br />Amendment to JPA Land Use Plan and Map to Approval <br />Johnson <br />expand Chapel Hill Transition Area to include nine <br />tracts located in Rural Buffer. <br />The staff recommendations for items JPA 1 -98 and JPA 3 -98 remain as noted in the table above. <br />Four letters have been submitted to the town regarding JPA -2 -98 and JPA 1 -98. Copies of those letters are <br />attached. <br />During the public hearing on April 8, a number of citizens provided comments regarding JPA 2 -98, plan and <br />agreement amendments pertaining to the adoption of the Facilitated Small Area Plan for Carrboro's Northern <br />Study Area. Where illustrative or appropriate, the comments or questions, staff response, and any proposed <br />changes to the text of the draft plan are presented in the following table. A number enclosed within parentheses <br />following any comment/question indicates that the comment was made by that number of speakers. <br />Table 2. Summary of comments, responses, and/or staff- recommended <br /># Comments/ Questions Staff - proposed chance and/or Response <br />1. <br />for approval concurrently with <br />plan.(3) <br />Z A reference to connector roads, <br />which had been eliminated by the <br />steering committee, remains on <br />page 78 of the plan. <br />3. How close to 75 percent threshold <br />is Transition Area 1? (2) <br />No change. On August 19, 1997, the board voted to submit plan to <br />ordinance drafting committee to prepare land use ordinance text and map <br />amendments needed to implement the plan, which along with the plan, <br />would be referred at a later date, to the Joint Planning Amendment Process <br />as a package. Following a worksession on January 20, 1998, at which the <br />progress of the committee was reviewed and a revised schedule considered, <br />the Board of Alderman voted to submit the Joint Planning Land Use Plan <br />and agreement amendments for review at the April 8 public hearing. <br />This reference will be removed. <br />See attached maps and item 9 below. <br />4 No mention at facilitated meeting The Transition Areas are defined in Section V of the Joint Planning Land <br />that proposed plan abrogates Use Plan as "suitable for urban-type densities." The Facilitated Plan <br />model of Transition Areas i and 11. proposes to cluster a bulk of the new residential development by <br />(2) encouraging village -scale development, and to conserve natural and <br />environmentally sensitive areas. A "conditional use floating zone' is <br />proposed as the mechanism by which village scale development will occur. <br />The requirement that proposed sites be served by water and sewer <br />coincides with the orderly growth objectives that necessitated the <br />designation of two Transition Areas in the Joint Planning Land use Plan. <br />5 Plan was prepared by Facilitation The plan incorporates the work of the original Small Area Planning Work <br />Steering Committee. (2) Group, Randall Arendt, the participants in the facilitated workshop, and the <br />Steering Committee. <br />b Consensus was not reached on Consensus was not reached on this item at the facilitated work group <br />27 <br />