Orange County NC Website
22 <br />3 <br />encouraging village -scale development to conserve natural and environmentally sensitive areas, allow <br />density bonuses for affordable housing meeting certain development criteria, and sanction neighborhood <br />and community scale commercial centers. The overall target density for the Northern Study Area is <br />approximately the same as the current density of the town: 2.1 dwelling units per acre. The target density <br />for mixed -use areas is approximately five dwelling units per acre. These development management <br />options have been selected in order to minimize the negative impacts of new development on <br />environmental quality, transportation, taxation and existing neighborhoods. These elements should <br />discourage a sprawled pattern of monotonous development, preserve Carrboro's unique, small town <br />character and allow the creation of new, neighborhood -scale communities which can be connected to <br />existing and new areas via a network of open space corridors. This plan attempts to balance community, <br />conservation and development objectives within the transition areas and extraterritorial jurisdiction that lie <br />to the north of Carrboro's town limits. Community and conservation objectives include allowing patterns of <br />growth which minimize negative impacts and maximize positive impacts on the community and allow for <br />the efficient provision of town services, the provision of a variety of housing types and styles, development <br />of a multi-modal transportation system, conservation of natural and environmentally sensitive areas, and <br />the protection of environmental quality, and the encouragement of active farmland preservation. <br />COMMENTS AND /OR QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, CHAPEL HILL TOWN <br />COUNCIL AND CARRBORO BOARD OF ALDERMEN: <br />Commissioner Gordon asked what the similarities and differences were between the proposed <br />floating zone and the way a Planned Development would be implemented in Orange County. <br />Mr. Williford indicated that the current joint plan requires that nodes have to be established for the <br />commercial or the mixed use areas. Floating zones would require a site plan as well as the traditional <br />quasi-judicial process approving plans based on the ordinance. There would be no specific nodes. <br />COMMENTS AND /OR QUESTIONS FROM CITZENS <br />Ms. Shirley Marshall spoke in support of both the Carrboro and Chapel Hill plans. She pointed out <br />that the goals were simple and specific in concept Elected and planning officials alike had essentially two <br />goals. The first goal was to define and plan for a northern build -out area for Chapel Hill and Carrboro. <br />The second goal was to support that defined area by creating a buffer against a rush of urbanization from <br />a .possible developing urban Durham area. The solution that was developed was called the Rural Buffer. <br />In addition, Orange County government was adamant that no more citizens would be placed in the <br />position where all planning decisions were made for them solely by elected officials for whom they could <br />not vote. Therefore, extension of extraterritorial jurisdiction could not be, and was not a part of the <br />solution. This agreement to stick to each units jurisdictional business has made this unique approach <br />workable and has brought the various groups to tonight's hearing and sets up the further refinements <br />necessary to enhance the goals of the Rural Buffer. She strongly supports both Carrboro and Chapel <br />Hill's proposed plans. <br />Mr. Randy Danzinger commented that this planning process was very thoughtfully started and <br />worked on diligently by many citizens and elected officials. He indicated that the ordinances which control <br />the implementation of the plan should come forth for consideration at the same time that the plan is <br />considered for adoption. This would allow citizens to see what they were actually going to get if they voted <br />to approve it Unless there is an overwhelming need to adopt this now, he requested that the adoption <br />process be postponed until the ordinance controlling the enforcement of it be presented as well. <br />-Mr. Wilford indicated that the Ordinance Drafting Committee has been working diligently. They are <br />working on guidelines for affordable housing, and design guidelines for the villages. It will probably be <br />August before the Ordinance is presented. In order to have an ordinance, a plan is necessary. It was <br />envisioned that the plan would be adopted first, to be followed by the ordinance. The plan is detailed and <br />