Minutes - 19770629 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Pat Crawford stated that she felt it was important that citizens understand the Ordinance and to know that the County will benefit from such an Ordinance. Andrew Dobelstein stated that the recommendation which was made by the Planning Board had two 'problems which bothered him. 1) The substance of the Subdivision Regulations and 2) concerning the process of the Regulations. He stated that he felt the Planning Board and the County Commissioners had reviewed the document thoroughly and changes had been made to the Ordinance. The second concern was with loading the Advisory Councils with the additional responsibility of the Subdivision Ordinance. He added that he had voted against the Planning Board's recommendation. Commissioner Willhoit asked if the delay recommended by the Planning Board was a planning problem that needed to be worked out, or a political problem. Lindsey Efland responded by stating that the Planning Board had not had sufficient time to research the document, and the intent of the motion of the Planning Board was to provide time to look at the document. He added that perhaps with more citizens input, citizens can see some of the probelms the Planning Board and the County Commissioners are facing in Planning for the County. Commissioner Willhoit reminded the two Boards that a 90 day delay had been granted in March, and the Land Owners Association had presented 13 recommendations to the Ordinance. He asked what is the problem with the Ordinance, and what needs to be done to it? Discussion ensued concerning the need for additional citizen input regarding the proposed Ordinance. Andrew Dobelstein stated that he felt the Planning Board should get down to the real work of planning, that the Planning Board should not be involved in a political issue such as the Subdivision Ordinance, but this should be the responsibility of the County Commissioners, Lindsey Efland stated that by having the Subdivision Regulations in effect in Eno and Chapel Hill Townships this will provide a "trial run" and will provide insight as to the effect of the Ordinance county-wide. "- Chairman Whitted asked the two Bcards to look again at the work program of the Planning Department and to plug the recommendation of the Planning Board into that document to provide the•Planning Staff with clear directions. Col. Breeze stated that he felt the Subdivision Ordinance was a good document, however, the County was facing several critical issues ~t this time and he felt a master plan was needed in the County for land use. He stated that the Ordinance had stirred interest and that the County should not proceed too fast. He added that he would like to know answers to two questions: 1) "Can we come up with a master plan for the Ceunty in land use" and 2) "How is the Subdivision Ordinance going to help the County?" Commissioner Willhoit responded by citing various problems in the County which had resulted from poor planning. He spoke of the sewage liminatians in Chapel Hill, the lack of control to protect the quality of water in the University Watershed, and to protect other watersheds. He stated that growth pressures along Highway 54 needed to be controlled. Mr. Willhoit stated that the population of Orange County had increased _ 19 percent since 1970. The Subdivision Ordinance would be a useful tool for the Planning Board as they looked at various subdivisions and how.the land is used. Marilyn Riddle stated that she felt the Planning Board should get on with the job of land use planning that will meet the problems dealing with water, services, and the providing of services for a growing population. She added the Subdivision Regulations are a part of that process and the first step. The time is right to develop a Land use Plan. Other members of the Planning Board expressed their reasons for making the recommendation that was submitted to the County Commissioners concerning the Subdivision Ordinance.