Orange County NC Website
<br />Scott ~adway stated that he was in favor of tho certainty of time limits for <br />the process. Mr. Railway believes that there needs to be accountability at the staff level, and that the <br />effected cltl~ns ere the ones most in need of adate-certain process, Mr. Railway stated that citizens <br />de~rve predictability by making the proc~s date-specific, even if some dates are shortened while other <br />dates are lengthened. <br />A oration was made by commissioner ~lacobs, seconded by ommisioner Halkiotis to <br />referthe proposed text amendment to the ubdiviion Regulations and Zoning ~rdin~nce to the <br />donning Board for recommendations to bo returned to the Board of bounty ommissionrs no loaner <br />than November ~,19gg. <br />VOTE: I~NANIM~US, <br />b. Section IV~B-~ ~, flexible ~~velapmer~t <br />~~~ ectior~ ~, Develapmont Star~da~ds <br />{a} ~. ~ , Estate Lot option; <br />~b~ D., duster option. <br />~~ staff ~I~entatior~: <br />Manning Director Craig presented this text amendment proposal <br />Benedict, ~~ ~ulestions from tine hoard of ~ulnty or-~mision~rs or <br />Plarrnir~~ Board -None. <br />~4~ A~Idier~ce omment~: <br />Steve Yuhasz, ~1~ St. Mary's load, sought clarification of the <br />amendment <br />Scott Railway questioned the ~ 5~ feet requirement and if this way within <br />the estate lot option only or others options. ~lenning Director Craig Benedict addressed hip concerns. <br />A notion was made by commissioner Jacobs, seconded by commissioner Brown, that <br />the proposed amendments b~ referred to the Planning Board for rocommendetions to bo returned to the <br />Board of bounty ommisioners no sooner than September 7,1 g9g. <br />VTI=: UNANIMOUS. <br />This ends the Joint ~uartarly Public Hearing with the Planning Board. hairordon ofthe Board of <br />bounty ommissioner will chair all remaining items on the agenda. <br />D. REP~~TS PRESENTED BY AUNTY MANAEI~ ,1~HN LINT <br />~ . khan ee ~~ orrrrr~isei~ners' Meetin Schedule. <br />The purpose of this item is to consider several changes or additions to the Board of <br />bounty commissioners' approved meeting schedule as follows: <br />fie} Sep~em~er 7, ~~9~: The consulting engineering firm will present its report <br />concerning the evaluation of proposed eanstructlon and demolition ~B~D~ Iondflll sites, Staff <br />recommends thatthe regular commissioners meeting scheduled for 7:Opm at the ~. cordon battle <br />courtroom be moved to the District courtroom on the second floor of the ourthoue, The second float <br />courtroom is bigger and more likely to accommodate the Jorge audience that may want to attend Chet <br />muting, <br />fib} e~fer~ber ~~, ~~~~: The commissioners may wish to schedule a public <br />hearing to receive public comment on the proposed ~~ sites. The meeting is also recommended to be <br />conducted at 7:opm in the second floor courtroom at the grange bounty ourthou~e in Hillsborough. <br />The Board may also with to invite the participation in this public hearing by the municipal governing <br />boards. <br />~c} epfer~ber , ~~~: The North erolina Administrative bode rewires <br />that before final oppraval i given to a municipal solid waste landfill, the local government when the <br />landfill is located ''shall hold at least one public meeting to inform tha community of the proposed waste <br />r~anagement activities"". The local government rrrust further "provide ~ public notice of the maeting at <br />least 0 days prior to the meeting", While extensive public information obout the &D activities that are <br />currently being considered hay already been provided, in order to moat the specific regulatory notice <br />