Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
L <br />Planning Director Craig Benedict spoke about site plan regulations, which <br />he fel should adequately address some of the concerns of nearby residents. <br />Karen Lincoln addressed the issue of kennels alr~~dy being ~Il~wed in the <br />AR district. <br />~~ A~adienc~ comments: Nine. <br />A motion was made by commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by ommissi~nerJacobs to <br />r~f~rthe proposed Zoning Atlas amendmentt~ the Planning Board for recommendations to be returned <br />to the Bard of bounty commissioners no sooner thin September ~ , ~ ~. <br />VOTE; UIVANIM~U. <br />b. -~-~~ Ernie M~~oom, cedar drove Township <br />PlannerJim Hinkley made the presentation, stating that much ofwhat he said <br />about the fiat rezoning request i relevant to this request. <br />~mmissioner Brown requested morn information on tha property. <br />Mr. Hinkley stated that the property is cleared, with access to the north and wart, <br />as wall as other venues, with subdivisions nearby. There ire Iow-lying wetlands and unusable portions <br />of the property. <br />Planning Board Member Barry Katz asked about the residences in place there <br />now, <br />~1 ~ Audience amrrrerrts; <br />charity smith, ~ 0~ 5 haw Mill R~~d, stated that residents did not want to <br />see their neighborhood tamed into a city. the suggested landscaping and recycling. <br />Robin Clark, ~0 haw Mill Rc~d, asked about the amount of land to be <br />rezoned. <br />Margaret Barry, ~~~ haw Mill Road, stated that she lives across from this <br />proposed rezoning and that she would net like to see anything change this residential area. the further <br />t~t~d that neighbors are concerned as to whit will be planed on the property. <br />Robin Clark asked as to what type of notificotion for the rozoning had been <br />given, Planner ,Jim Hinkley toted that everyone who resided within ~~~ feet of the rezoning area was <br />notified. Planning ~ir~ctor Craig Benedict vorified this procedure. Marg~r~t Barry stated thot she did nat <br />r~c~ive a letter and ~ follow-up is to be conducted to ascerkain why she did not receive notification. <br />A motion was made by omn~issioner Halkiotis, seconded by ommission~r Croy to <br />rf~rthis proposed Zoning Atlas amendm~ntto the Planning Board for recor~r~~ndationsto be returned <br />to the Board of bounty commissioners no sooner than September ~ , ~ g, <br />VOTE: UNANIM~~1. <br />~rar~~e ~~nty Zoning ~r~inance Text Amendments <br />a. Amendments belated to child dare paciiity Provisions <br />~~} Article 4, section Permitted ~Jse Table; <br />~} Article , section ~.7 Large Day ire Hamel; <br />~~ Article ~, action ~.~,1 any ire Facility; <br />~4~ Article Definitions. <br />Planner Jim Hinkley pr~onted these text ~rnendments. <br />ommissianerJacobs had several questions a to the amendments. <br />Manager Link asked Planner Hinkley to consult with Marti Pryer-~cok and ensure <br />the language is consistent and correct. <br />Planning Beard Member nie Lea also had questions as to the omendments, <br />Planning Board Member Caren Barrows questioned whit the terminology was for <br />someono who is taken care of less than four ~4} hours per day, <br />bounty Attorney eaffrey Gledhill spoke regarding tho definitions of day care. <br />Planning Board Member Howard McAdams asked how many nonconforming day <br />care centers we would have if these regulations were approved. Planner Hinkley stated that those day <br />c~r~ centers are certified by the state, so them would be none. <br />