Browse
Search
Minutes - 19990330
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Minutes - 19990330
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2009 4:56:24 PM
Creation date
8/5/2009 4:55:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/30/1999
Meeting Type
Municipalities
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 03-30-1999
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 03-30-1999
Agenda - 03-30-1999 - 3a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 03-30-1999
Agenda - 03-30-1999 - 3b-2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 03-30-1999
Agenda - 03-30-1999 - 4a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 03-30-1999
Agenda - 03-30-1999 - 4b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 03-30-1999
Agenda - 03-30-1999 - 4c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 03-30-1999
Agenda - 03-30-1999 - 5
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 03-30-1999
Agenda - 03-30-1999 - Special Notice
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1999\Agenda - 03-30-1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
roads or developing a connectivity plan. These rural roads could see a change in their character <br />as a result of this plan and it will be important to promote coordination between developers for <br />the planning of bicycle, pedestrian, transit and automobile transportation routes. Also, increased <br />incentives could be included in the plan to encourage developers to dedicate additional lands for <br />park development and to ensure that the dedicated parklands would be interconnected. Its <br />important to make sure that land is dedicated in such a way as to serve the entire community by <br />having these lands be interconnected rather than having small five-acre parcels distributed <br />throughout the area. He mentioned that this may already be addressed in Carrboro's Parks and <br />Recreation Ordinance. If that is the case, he suggested that it be referenced in this document. <br />The same idea could be implemented into the Office Assembly (OA) so that it does not result in <br />many one-acre OA areas. Lastly, he commented on Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) . <br />He suggested that there be support for statewide enabling legislation to allow the Transfer of <br />Development Rights. This is an opportunity to implement the Transfer of Development rights <br />program in an area which has all of the characteristics of a "receiving area", such as water and <br />sewer and good transportation. Some of the TDR techniques could be implemented with this <br />area being the receiving area. He stated that County staff would continue their review of the <br />existing Town Ordinance. Finally, he mentioned that it is important that the County be brought <br />in the process for informal review as soon as is possible in the process. <br />QUESTIONS AND/OR COMMENTS FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS: <br />Chair Gordon asked if the Ordinance could be annotated by strikethrough or bold type so that it <br />would be easier to track the modifications. <br />Town Manager Morgan stated that they have annotated changes in the past but the current <br />changes are extensive and they had not attempted to do that. He indicated that they were <br />available to Orange County staff to make sure that they clearly understood the changes. <br />Chair Gordon referred to the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR's) and suggested finding a <br />way that TDR's could be implemented without holding up the process of adopting these <br />amendments. She suggested that there could be a reserve section that could be fleshed out at <br />a later time. If the Ordinance were adopted with the higher densities put into place it could not <br />be changed later, however, if a reserve section were included, then the reserve section could be <br />fleshed out later. <br />Alderman Gist stated that she was thinking along similar lines of creating a "bookmark" which <br />would allow TDR's to be included in the plan at a later date. <br />Mayor Nelson stated that he was supportive of TDR's as a concept and he felt that they could <br />possibly work in this particular case. However, he also felt that it could be difficult to get <br />community support in the Small Area Planning area. This is suggesting funneling density into <br />an area where residents probably do not want more density. It would be possible to build that <br />type of community support because it would in fact take density away from areas we want to <br />protect and locate it where density could be better supported. If the Board of Commissioners <br />are interested in pursuing this it will take a great deal of time to work with people in this area <br />building that kind of support. <br />Chair Gordon stated that she had made the assumption that this density would be created in the <br />villages as a part of the plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.