Minutes - 19950828 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

amendment. He pointed to the map and said that part of this is a natural revive that will serve as a buffer. MOTION A motion was made by Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to refer the proposed amendments to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no sooner than October 2, 1995. VOTE: UNANIMOUS c. Article 6.29.3 - Economic Development Districts Design Manual (Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment) To receive public comments Planner Mary Willis presented a proposed amendment to eliminate the requirement for a 100-foot buffer along the perimeter of an Economic Development District (EDD) which abuts an EDD adopted by another planning jurisdiction. The area added to the EDD on June 26 including properties along the west side of Old NC86 north of Cates Creek ranges from 300 to 500 feet in depth, and the perimeter buffer of 100 feet poses development constraints. The staff proposes that the Design Manual be modified to state that where the perimeter of the EDD abuts, not just another jurisdictional boundary but one where the EDD provisions have been adopted, that in those cases the perimeter boundary not apply since there is the same zoning on either side of the property. In answer to a question from Commissioner Willhoit, Willis said that the goal of the buffer is to protect adjacent properties from any effects of the EDD. He is concerned that this will look like a commercial strip and wonders if there should be some kind of buffers. Willis explained that there are still setback and landscaping/screening requirements that are a part of the Design Standards that prevent that strip from occurring. In answer to a question from Bill Waddell, Willis said that the natural constraints, floodplains, etc. of the creek itself would remain to whatever width is applicable. Mary Willis clarified that the 100-foot wide buffer need not be provided when the land located in the jurisdiction of the other local government has been zoned Economic Development District and designated the same (e.g. Primary Development, Secondary Development) as the land located in the Orange County Economic Development District. In answer to a question from Planning Board member Renee Price, Willis said that there will be open space. Planning Director Marvin Collins said that in the adopted Economic Development Design Manual there are schematic plans that designate certain areas as open space and in addition to that there is a large amount of green space. Based on calculations, within that whole area, there will be at least 400 open space. Mary Willis clarified for Karen Barrows the area to which this proposed amendment would apply.