Orange County NC Website
2~~ <br />budget should be increased to include the cost of elections to be held <br />during the next fiscal year. This cost will be approximately $20,000. <br />Commissioner Gustaveson stated that the Human Services Committee had <br />met concerning the proportional share of local mhtching funds for support <br />of various County based programs. It is hoped that Chapel Hill and the <br />County will add $2,000 each for funding of JOCCA, and that Carrboro will <br />contribute $1,500. For Council on Aging, Mr. Gustaveson stated that it is <br />hoped that both the County and Chapel Hill will contribute $3,000 and he <br />does not know if Carxboro will contribute any amount to COA. <br />Commissioner Pinney stated that he felt the County was picking up <br />more than their share of the cost of these programs. <br />During the review of Agency Support, Museum, the Finance Officer was <br />asked to request the Museum to get on the same fiscal year as the County. -- <br />The .Public Safety section of the budget was reviewed. <br />Under Animal Control, Commissioner Willhoit suggested that the Board <br />consider increasing the charge for dog tags and then hire one additional <br />animal control officer. He suggested further a cross reference of the <br />dog tag and dog vaccinations. This discussion will be pursued further at <br />another time. <br />The Sheriff's budget was reviewed and the County Manager stated that <br />it was recommended that this budget be funded 100 percent in order to <br />implement the programs outlined by the Sheriff. The Sheriff presently has <br />seven vacancies on his staff.of 37 positions. Merit raises and longevity <br />pay is not included in the Sheriff's budget. <br />The Commissioners reviewed the Public Works Section of the budget. <br />The Gounty Manager informed the Board that funding of seven of the new <br />CETA positions for the Buildings and Grounds Department would have to be <br />picked up by the County after the first year. There is a funding commit- <br />ment by CETA through June 30, 1978 <br />The Board then decided to continue discussion of the two School <br />Systems' budgets. <br />Chairman Whitted stated that $318 per pupil is recommended in the <br />proposed budget and the figure $142,870 has been proposed to be added to <br />current expense, which would increase the per capital current expense to <br />$332 per pupil. <br />Commissioner Gustaveson suggested that the $85,000 fund balance be <br />used to help bring the budget up to maintenance level. <br />Discussion ensued of what programs would be cut in the Orange County <br />system with the per capital current expense at $332. <br />Dan Lunsford stated that 3~ teachers would be cut, one-half time <br />librarian, the media center, one counselor from the elementary schools, <br />and one English teacher from the high school, plus, the $85,000 fund <br />balance would be used up. STill the system would need an additional <br />$lOD,000 to maintain operating level. <br />Commissioner Pinney asked how the $105,000 the Orange County System <br />has in Capital Outlay would be spent. <br />The reply was that the State Board of Education directed the School <br />Systems as to what categories certain funds should go. <br />Following further discussions and calculations, Commissioner Gustaveson <br />stated that he could see no way pf supplying the needed current expense and <br />capital outlay for the two school systems, except for a four cent tax in- <br />crease. <br />Mr. Lunsford stated that $332 per pupil amounted to about $1,573,348. <br />Another $100,000 would bring the County Schools to a total of $1,675,000. <br />This amount between what the County School has expressed as needs makes <br />$143,000. To use the $85,000 fund balance, there would be a discrepancy <br />of $58,000 and Mr. Lunsford feels the County Schools can live with this. <br />