Browse
Search
Minutes - 19950525
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1990's
>
1995
>
Minutes - 19950525
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2014 2:03:30 PM
Creation date
8/5/2009 10:01:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/25/1995
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-25-1995
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1995\Agenda - 05-25-95
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 <br />them a home. She asked that the impact fee be made fair to all <br />residents in Orange County. <br />DEBBIE WAHLEN supports the proposed increase and asked that <br />the Board of County Commissioners approve $1,500. She presented a <br />petition with 57 signatures which reads as follows: <br />We, the undersigned, although unable to attend the <br />public hearing on May 25, 1995, urge the Orange County <br />Commissioners to: <br />1. increase the impact fee on new residential <br />construction to $1,500 immediately; <br />2. carry out a survey this summer to establish <br />representative student-generation rates for new residences; and <br />3. establish an appropriate sliding scale for impact <br />fees as soon as possible thereafter, to incorporate local school <br />construction standards and newly established student-generation <br />rates. <br />She feels it is not unfair to ask new residential growth to <br />share the cost of the impact on the schools. She asked that the <br />fee be increased to $1,500 for the Chapel Hill-Carrboro District. <br />She presented an article which explained how Atlanta handles <br />impact fees. The article says that the fees have been a major way <br />for them to do things (like building infrastructure) that they <br />couldn't have done otherwise. <br />LEON MEYERS spoke against financing public education with an <br />impact fee. He feels that public education is part of government <br />and benefits the entire community and should be funded by the <br />entire community. He urged the Board of County Commissioners to <br />be honest and rational in their decision on impact fees. He <br />asked that the Board take advantage of all the hard work done by <br />the Planning Department and make the right decision. <br />PATRICK MULKEY spoke against the impact fee as it is <br />currently designed. He will remain against the impact fee until <br />County spending is brought under control, including both school <br />systems. He feels that increasing the impact fee is the easy way <br />out, cutting the budget and setting the money aside for future <br />capital needs takes some action by the Board of County <br />Commissioners. He questioned which road the Board of County <br />Commissioners will take. <br />LISA WARREN is more against the way that the fee is a flat <br />fee. She and her husband are looking into building a house and <br />must reduce the size of the house because of the impact fee. She <br />feels that a lot of children are in apartments. She asked that <br />the Board of County Commissioners make the fee more fair and look <br />at incomes and other children in the system who are not included <br />in the fee. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.