Browse
Search
Minutes - 19950525
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1990's
>
1995
>
Minutes - 19950525
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2014 2:03:30 PM
Creation date
8/5/2009 10:01:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/25/1995
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-25-1995
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1995\Agenda - 05-25-95
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 <br />impact of new rapid development on the Chapel Hill/Carrboro City <br />School System and that an increased impact fee is an important <br />part of the revenue mix. They support raising the fee to $1,500 <br />and separating Chapel Hill/Carrboro and Orange County fees. They <br />support the impact fee study which is being done at this time. <br />ALAN BELCH talked about bets being made on how high the <br />impact fee will be raised. He said that new schools are needed <br />and there is no question that the County must pay for these new <br />schools. What increases the need for schools is children and <br />unless there is a head tax on every new child coming into either <br />of the school systems, there is no fairness to what is really <br />happening. He stated that a $1,500 impact fee will cost <br />homebuyers $3,000 in payments. He believes the cost of housing <br />will continue to rise while the real issue of creating a bigger <br />business base will suffer. He said that it concerns many in the <br />County that significantly inappropriate figures have been used by <br />various citizens groups to justify a larger increase and the press <br />and the public seem to buy the numbers without question. <br />GLORIA FALEY, resident for seventeen years and a volunteer in <br />the schools, supports the Board of County Commissioners ten-point <br />plan. She supports the $1,500 impact fee and encourages <br />implementing a sliding scale based on number of bedrooms per <br />square footage which will insure the diversity and richness of the <br />community. She said that the bulk of the homes being built and <br />sold in Chapel Hill are not affordable housing but $150,000 plus. <br />She supports building and maintaining a working team of the Chapel <br />Hill Council, the Carrboro Board of Aldermen and the School Boards <br />to insure that any land use plan includes the children's education <br />and a plan that requires responsibility for existing and new <br />residents of the schools and responsibility of the developers who <br />will sell their homes because of the high quality of our schools. <br />She feels that the roots of the American dream lie in a good <br />public education. <br />KEN SCOTT said he feels that $1,500 is a large figure. <br />Orange County has 5,400 students now compared to twenty-five years <br />ago when they had 5,000 students. <br />KAREN BARROWS spoke in support of the impact fee. She feels <br />it is good budget management and that developers will absorb some <br />of the cost as well as citizens. She noted that borrowed money <br />cost more. She supports a sliding scale. Education cost more <br />money today as well as constructing new schools cost more today. <br />EARL DAVIS is against the impact fee and against any more <br />taxes in this County. He feels the County does not care about the <br />low income population. <br />MARY JO BATEMAN, parent of three children in the Chapel Hill- <br />Carrboro schools, read a letter from Livy Ludington who supports <br />the increase to $1,500 for the school impact fee. In summary, she <br />said that the schools are severely overcrowded and action must be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.