Browse
Search
Minutes - 19770531
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1970's
>
1977
>
Minutes - 19770531
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 11:54:52 AM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:22:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/31/1977
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~9 <br />Mr. Minis explained that these sites are very small and are not <br />usually large areas, and that the agencies which will review will only <br />make recommendations and there is no State Law which say that approval <br />must be denied of these sites. <br />Mr. Tony Seater asked of the special expertise required which was <br />mentipned on page 8, section 3). <br />The Planning Airector, Ervin Dobson stated that if additional expertise <br />was needed, these people could include local personnel, County agency people <br />local laymen, Soil Specialist in Raleigh, and persons from Region J. <br />He added that the list was left open becuase one might find a unique situ- <br />- ation in a subdivision which would prohibit the Planning Department from <br />getting the needed answers to salve problems. <br />Mr. Seater stated that the way the Ordinance was written, people <br />could eventually lose their freedom of the land. He stated that he <br />wanted to see the section which required agencies' approval stricken <br />from the Ordinance. <br />Mr. C. W. Davis asked why the Subdivision Ordinance was necessary. <br />He added that he had lived in Orange County for 80 years and was not <br />aware of Subdivision Regulations existing in Chapel Hi11 Township or any <br />other part of the County. <br />Ms. Riddle stated that the present Subdivision Regulations covers two <br />townships and have been under:;discussion fa r.the last year to revise these <br />regulations tc make them more workable and to extend the regulations to <br />other townships within the County. She stated that the County was growing <br />in population and it is necessary that the subdivision of land be a matter <br />of public opinion. Land in the County does come under the interest of the <br />public whether it be subdivided and developed in ways that are compatible <br />with the growth of the County. <br />Chairman Whitted stated that the Subdivision Regulations and the <br />Zoning Ordinance were implemented in Chapel Hill Township in 1967, and <br />in 1970 in Eno Township. <br />Mr. Davis stated that he was not in favor of the Subdivision Regula- <br />tions and the Zoning Ordinance. <br />Mr. Gera Sykes asked of the qualification of the members of the <br />Planning Board and the experiences they have had in land value. He stated <br />that there should be enough expertise on the Planning Board to know what <br />needs to be done if anything. He stated that he felt people who awned <br />the land knew as much as anyone else as to what needed to be done with the <br />land. <br />James Bennett from West Hillsborough spoke against the Subdivision <br />Ordinance. <br />Susie Pulley, who lives in Northern Orange County, stated that the <br />Ordinance should not be forced upon the people in Orange County. <br />Ben Lloyd read an editorial from the Farm Bureau Newsletter regarding <br />the dangers of excessive regulations imposed by the Federal Government:. <br />He stated that the Farmers and Land Owners Association had appeared before <br />the Board of Commissioners in March and had requested a 90 day extension <br />in order that citizens and Planning Berard member might have more time tc <br />review the Ordinance and Amendments. The Association then came before <br />the Planning Board and recommended certain changes to the Ordunance, and <br />some of these changes were implemented. Mr. Lloyd then proceeded to list <br />the changes which were not granted. <br />Mr. Lloyd spoke of Section TV-B'b. Utility Easements. Mr. Lloyd <br />stated that this section was totally unacceptable and the Association <br />had requested that this section be deleted entirely. <br />Jeff Gledhill, County Attorney asked to speak to the Utility Easement <br />Section. Mr. Gledhill stated that the way that the Utility Easement <br />Section was worked in the Ordinance dealing with the Utility Easements is <br />that is grants power to the County to require Utility Easement. This is <br />different from the deeded easement itself between the land owner and the <br />power company or the utility company. He stated that the way the Ordinance <br />is worded now, it is intended and would be used only in situations where <br />you have urban utility situations, principally water and sewer. These arm <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.