Orange County NC Website
l84 <br />charitable activities, up until 1975. The building presently is in need <br />o~ repairs and had applied to the Town of Chapel Hi11 for Community Devel- <br />opment funds for improvement to the structure. Subject to the Pines <br />Community Center being able to resolve their tax liability, the Town of <br />Chapel Hill has approved the grant and the Center will be able to operate <br />as a library, day care center and general recreational and community center. <br />Mr. Taylor stated that it was his judgement that the Pines Community Center <br />should be exempted from taxes for a revalent period. General Statutes <br />stated that a non-profit organization, organized under Chapter 55A of the <br />N. C. General Statutes is entitled to a release of any taxes levied against <br />its property from 1969 until December 31, 1973. The law prior to January 1, <br />1974, made property owned by a non-profit corporation such as the Pines <br />Community Center automatically exempt from ad valorem taxes. For the <br />period from January 1, 1974, through 1ecember 31., 1976, an appeal may be <br />made by the owner of property discovered by the Tax Supervisor if the <br />property owner feels that he is entitled to an exemption. Further, the <br />General Statutes exempts non profit community or neighborhood organizations <br />such as the Pines Community Center if the property is used "Wholly and <br />exclusively by its owner for non profit educational, scientific, literary, <br />or charitable purposes". <br />Mr. Taylor stated that at no time has this community group made <br />applics~ion for exemption for 1974 to the present, therefore, for the <br />year 1974 to the present, the Commissioners are hearing the appeal from <br />the discovery. Mr. Taylor explained further that the community group <br />acquired the building in February, 1969, and at that time there was a tax <br />lien on the building and property which had,not been paid. He added that <br />due to the state of the building, that it was not used at all during 1976. <br />He requested that the Commissioners grant the tax exemption for the years <br />1974 and 1975. <br />The County Attorney stated that the County could not legally exempt <br />the taxes far 1969, and that they should be paid. <br />The Tax Supervisor stated that whoever owned the building in January <br />of 1969 is responsibile for paying the taxes. I~t was pointed out that <br />the building was donated to the Pine Community Center in February, 1969. <br />January 1, 1970 was the first year the property was listed as belonging <br />to the Pines Community Center. <br />ThA Tax Supervisor stated that he questioned whether the Commissioners <br />could release the property. He suggested that the Board pxoceed under the <br />adjustment of a tax bill for release of taxes for more than one year. He <br />stated that there was another statute whereby the $oard of Commissioners <br />could compromise a tax bill xather than the release procedure. <br />The County Attorney stated that if the owner demonstrates that the <br />property meets the conditions for exemption, the exemption may be approved <br />by the Board of Commissioners at that time. Tn his opinion, the Board of <br />Commissioners is not liminted to one year. <br />Discussion ensued. The County Attorney stated that the Board was to <br />consider an application for exemption for the years 1974, 1975, and 1976. <br />The criteria is that this group was a non profit organization and the pro- <br />perty was used wholly and exclusively by its owner for non profit educa- <br />tional, scientific, literary, or charitable purposes." <br />Commissioner Willhoit moved that the tax exemption for the years 1974, <br />1975, and 1976 be granted. This motion died fdr lack of a second. <br />Further discussion ensued. It was pointed out that a full recreation <br />program was in operation at the community center during the years ].974 and <br />1975. <br />Commissioner Gustaveson moved that the tax exemption for the years <br />1974 and 1975 be granted. Commissioner Willhoit seconded the motion. <br />Commissioner Walker stated that he felt this action was inconsistent <br />with other appeals, and that he did not agree with the opinions which had <br />been expressed. <br />The Chairman called for a vote on the motion. Voting aye were <br />Commissoners Gustaveson, Pinney, Whitted, and Willhoit. Voting nay was <br />Commissioner Walker. The motion was declared passed. <br />