Orange County NC Website
153 <br />Mr. Davis stated that there had been several fires in the Rangewood <br />area last year and residents of the area had been bold that South Orange <br />could not come again if fire occurred because of insurance stipulations. <br />Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner <br />Gustaveson, it was moved and adopted that Chief Swiger, Mr. Davis and <br />the County Attorney work together tv draw the application for inclusion <br />of the Rangewood area in the South Orange Fire District. <br />.. Commissioner Gustaveson suggested that Mr. Walker, the Fire Commis- <br />sioner keep in touch with the developments in the Rangewood area. <br />The Board agreed to discuss the appointment of trustees to fire <br />districts at a future meeting. <br />Ttem 16: The Social Services Director will deliver the proposed <br />budget of the Social Service Board for 1977-1978 fiscal year. The Board <br />of Commissioners should tentatively approve or modify this document before <br />April 15, 1977. ' <br />The Chairman recognized Tom Ward, Social Services Director. <br />Mr. Ward stated that the proposed budget figure for 1977'78 was <br />$740,818, which includes 25 percent of the contract purchased services <br />and $39,135 for CETA funds. These two items were omitted last year from <br />the budget and the State sent the budget back to the Department and asked <br />that they be included. <br />He referred the Board to a budget summary sheet which provided a <br />breakdown of cost of the County's Social Services programs. <br />Mr. Ward painted out to the Board that no request had been received <br />from Frank Porter Graham and an estimation had been made of $200,000 from <br />the previous year's budget. Frank Porter Graham has indicated that they <br />will submit a request for funding to the State, however, no decision has <br />been made. <br />Mr. Ward stated that $697,833 would be required of the County as com- <br />pared tv $632,747 required far last year. He stated that he .hoped to <br />-- use two CETA positions to fund general assistance programs and to add to <br />transportation services. <br />Salary increases were anticipated to be between 5 and YO percent with <br />merit increases. <br />Actually, only one position has been added to the Social Services <br />budget, which is a Social Worker 2. <br />Mr. Ward reviewed with the 8vard the programs in'the County which <br />will be partially funded with Title XX monies. <br />Discussion ensued concerning the phase dawn of Title XX monies antici- <br />pated by 1980. Mr. Ward suggested that the Board decide what programs <br />they wished to retain and if funds were not available, tv fund just what <br />is possible with the available funds. <br />Mr. Gustaveson suggested that the Board not wait to next year to <br />speak out about Title XX allocation. He stated that even with the County <br />picking up a significant part of the funding, it would still be more than <br />they could possible support. <br />The Social Service Director stated that the Legislature set up a <br />certain amount of monies for the State to match in the 5ocidl Services <br />Administrative budget. A percentage is set each year based an inflation <br />and the increase in budget. With no added monies available between last <br />year and the next year, the percentage is being cut to get the same amount <br />of money. He added that the Legislature is the key to a portion of the <br />funding. The State should be willing to help the County. <br />Mr. Ward stated that the additional items in the budge included: <br />A. Aid to Blind Program $ 4,373 <br />B. General Assistance 24,000 <br />C. Emergency Medical 1,000 <br />D. Back to School 3,000 <br />32,373 <br />County Cost Form 1046 Line H 740,818 <br />` 774,191 <br />Less CETA Funds & Contract March -- 89,884 <br />.,.r+m nnnm mn nnTn.Tmv t C p'7 ~ A 7 <br />