Orange County NC Website
$5~ <br />Clearwater Lake Road. <br />Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner <br />Pinney, it was moved an d adopted to approve the final plat of Clearwater <br />Hills. <br />E. Grampian Hills: This plat proposes the revision of an existing <br />subdivision by shortening a road to comply with the suggestions of the <br />Erosion Control Officer. The Erosion Control Officer has investigated <br />this area and found a natural drain ran through the cul-de-sac. He has <br />suggested that the road be shortened to get it out of the drainage area. <br />Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Walker, ' <br />it was moved and adopted to approve the final plat of Grampian Hills. <br />~'. Thomas Lawrence Summey: This plat was not recorded within the <br />60 day period after approval and needs to be reapproved. <br />Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Walker, <br />it was moved and adopted to reapprove the final plat of Thomas Lawrence <br />Summey. <br />G. Request from Raymond Williams to reconsider his rezoning request. <br />Chairman Whitted stated that Mr. Williams had presented a rezoning request <br />to the Board last October to rezone property located near Blackwood Station <br />in Chapel Hill Township from residential to general commercial. This re- <br />quest was denied. The Zoning Ordinance states that a request can be re- <br />considered after a l2 month period. He asked the County Attorney of his <br />legal opinio.n.. <br />Jeff Gledhill, County Attorney, stated that the Board could set any <br />method of procedure they wished to for establishing zoning matters, however, <br />the method they should follow should be as set out in the Zoning Ordinance <br />which requires a 12 month waiting period before reconsideration. <br />Commissioner Walker asked if one of the majority voters to the motion _ <br />to deny the rezoning request should ask that the request be reconsidered. <br />The County, Attorney stated that his opinion would be to follow the <br />zoning procedures. <br />Mx. Williams stated that from maps he had seen of the property in <br />question, it was shown as future commercial. The back side of the pro- <br />perty has 40 acres of commercial zoned property. On one side of this <br />property is a trailor park and on the other side is a commercial business. <br />Property across the road is a graveyard. He stated that the property is <br />totally surrounded by commercial property. <br />It was pointed out that a mobile home park is not commercial use. <br />Chris Edwards stated that the area consisted of three zoned mobile home <br />parks, one general commercial zone, two non-conforming uses and the <br />graveyard, which is zoned residential. <br />The Chairman asked if there were any questions of Mr. Williams. He <br />then informed Mr. 'Williams that he could present this request again after <br />12 months from the original date of the denial. <br />Mr. Whitted recognized Edgar Long from the Cedar Grove Community, <br />who was present to present petitions from that area to the Board of <br />Commissioners requesting fire protection. <br />Mr. Long stated that he had over 200 names of petitioners from <br />Cedar Grove Township. <br />Upon motion of Commissioner Walker, seconded by Commissioner <br />Gustaveson, it was moved and=adopted to accept the petitions and to <br />support the request of Cedar Grove Township for fire protection. <br />(For copy of Resolution calling for referendum for Fire Districts <br />see page 161 of this book.) <br />Chairman Whitted requested that Mr. Lang, or members from the <br />Steering Committee submit to the Board recommendations of three persons <br />to serve as Trustees for the Cedar Grove Fire District. <br />The Board scheduled Wednesday, April 6, 1977, at 7:20 p.m., as the <br />