Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
ZS <br />Judith Wegner; Could you clarify on that issue also. It has been a real concern to the community with the situation <br />with Fiesta Grill. lam wondering about whatever is done to this application, would that have a bearing on the <br />situation there? <br />Craig Benedict; Cptian two could correct that. <br />Judith Wegner; They have a health department issue because with the number of tables, they were exceeding their <br />septic space. <br />Craig Benedict; Let's move to Option 4 a full SAP would be tifne consuming' and not on the Board ~ of County <br />Commissioners o9-1 g priority list, Those are the options. <br />Brian Crawford; It sounds like Uption 3 settles the problem also, <br />Craig Benedict; Yes For the grill <br />Dark Marcoplos: The instigator of this is the prope~y with the used furniture store? In terms of the Fiesta Grill, they <br />have enough land if they are allowed to go beyond the 5 acres? <br />Craig Benedict: They would have to ask for an expansion of their commercial use or a planned development would <br />be required since the Fiesta Grill is an the same site with another use on the site. <br />Mark Marcoplos; The projection would be September 5, ?409 but also an additional time period for them to work <br />out those issues? <br />Craig Benedict; Yes probably, <br />Judith Uvegner: If there is a solution here, people should know about it and support it. <br />Mark Marcoplos; Gould be a few months after that. Going from f ve to nine acres, it would seem that the larger <br />facilities could be located there? <br />Craig Benedict: You may have the one or two acre commercial activities there. That is why the future plan could <br />take a good look at it. It has always been intended that the rural activity nodes could be some locations for rural <br />residents to decrease the miles traveling to the urban areas and would have more general stores and uses. We were <br />going to take a look at post comprehensive plan update, It was on our agenda o examine these nodes, <br />Mark Marcoplos; I would like a little note that if an increase is suggested that rural scale and architectural scale <br />should be adopted, <br />Judith Wegner; what is magic about nine acres? <br />Craig Benedict; It is not a magic number; we used nine because that is what the code said if it ever reached a <br />certain density standpoint in the future. If the board would like to come up with. a different number, we would want to <br />try to have a little mare logic to it. <br />Judith Uvegner. It seems it would be too bad to move it to~nine~and~then~in~ later move it ta~another number.ry~It would ~~~ <br />be fair to everyone who was thinking of locating there to have some grounding as to why . <br />Craig Benedict; what types of uses to you anticipate there? if we do came up with a standard, we might say x <br />mount of acres for developed parcels, <br />Mark Marcoplos; is there a rnnmum that would. satisfy bath of them. Maybe we do .minimum and. get what they <br />need and as soon as possible start this process where the con~n~unity could het involved and decide uuhat they want. <br />