Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />7 <br />S <br />9 <br />~D <br />1~ <br />12 <br />~3 <br />14 <br />~5 <br />~~ <br />~7 <br />~S <br />f9 <br />2~ <br />2 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />2~ <br />27 <br />2$ <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />3~ <br />37 <br />38 <br />3~ <br />4D <br />4~ <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />5~ <br />5 <br />52 <br />53 <br />54 <br />55 <br />56 <br />ATTACHMENT FIVE (5) - EXCERPT OF FEBRUARY 4, 2009 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MINUTEB <br />QRANGE CUUNTY PLANNING ~nARD <br />FEBRUARY 4, 2409 <br />REGULAR MEETING <br />27 <br />MEMBERS PRESENT; Brian Crawford, Eno Township At~Large ~Chair~; Jay Bryan, Chapel H[Il Representative ~Vice- <br />Chair~; Rachel Phelps Hawkins, Hillsborough Representative; Tommy McNeill, Eno Township Representative; Lary <br />BobbinCooke, Cheek Township Representative; Larry Wright, Cedar Grove Township At~Large; Nathan Chambers, <br />Cheeks Township At-Large; Judith Wegner, Bingham Township; Mark Marcoplos; Bingham Township AtwLarge, <br />MEMBERS ABSENTS Jeffrey Schmitt, Cedar Grave Township; Samantha Cabe, Chapel Hill Township AtMLarge; <br />Joel Forrest Knight, Little River Representative; <br />STAFF PRESENT: Craig Benedict, Planning Director; Tory Alfieri, Comprehensive Planning Supervisor; Robert Davis, <br />Planner [[I; Tina Love, Administrative Assistant II <br />AGENpA ITEM ~ : REVIEW ~F OPTIONS CGNGERN[NG DEVELOPMENT WITHIN ORANGE CGUNTY NGnES <br />Presenter: Craig Benedict, Planning Director <br />Craig Benedict Reviewed various options and timelines relating to possible amendments to the orange County <br />Zoning Ordinance clarifying development limitations within existing Nades.~ <br />OPTION ONE: Da nothing and maintain the current constraints contained within the Ordinance. <br />OPTION TwO: Amend Sections 4.2.8 and 4.2.9 of the Zoning Ordinance to remove existing <br />language establishing the five ~5~ acre limit on non-residential zoning within the <br />Rural Community Activity Nodes <br />OPTION THREE: Amend Sections x.2,8 and 4,2,9 of the Zoning Ordinance to include language <br />exempting the necessary active septic andlor repair fields from the acreage <br />computation. <br />OPTION FOUR: Complete a Small Area Plan for the U~h[te .Cross Node developing specific <br />standards and guidelines governing development. <br />Judith vllegner: Could you clarify how many nodes are there in the County? <br />Craig Benedict: vllhite Cross, Cedar Grove, Carr, Caldwell and Schley. <br />Judith Wegner. If you did a text amendment, it would apply to all those? <br />Craig Benedict; we could just do Ul~hite Cross for now. A text amendment with a specific reference to white Cross. <br />Judith wegnerr You would have two classes of rural activity nodes? <br />Craig Benedict: Yes but implemented at the zoning level, <br />Judith 1Negner: [have been thinking about Bingham Township with the airport proposal and wondered if it would be <br />possible tv do a more developed township analysis. <br />Craig Benedict: I think the staff recommendation is to do something immediately and put it on the future calendar to <br />examine all the nodes. Option three would be next. <br />