Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-18-2009 - C2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 05-18-2009
>
Agenda - 05-18-2009 - C2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2009 12:23:18 PM
Creation date
7/21/2009 12:21:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/18/2009
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C2
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20090518
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
24 <br />3. Referral of the proposed amendment to the Planning Board <br />for review and recommendation ~ approximately one ~1 } to <br />three ~3} months depending on board workload, <br />4. Review and action by the BCC -~ approximately one ~~ } <br />month, <br />5. Anticipated decision by BCC: September 1 ~, 2409 <br />The fatal timeline for the development and possible implementation <br />of this option is eight ~8} months. Staff would have to devote existing <br />resources to develop and present this proposed amendment as well <br />as generate all necessary memvrandum~s}, maps, and other support <br />documents that nay be required. <br />PR~]'s: This option would keep the existing limitations in place but would <br />allow far the required septic andlor repair areas for each parcel of <br />property not to be included within the acreage limit calculation <br />CNN's: This option represents a potential recardkeeping nightmare far staff. <br />The County would be required to keep constant track of development <br />on property to ensure compliance with the acreage limitations while <br />at the same time keeping (rack of the acreage of commercial coned <br />property not subject to the limitation. <br />This option is not an effective means of regulating development <br />within the Nade nor is it an effective means of encouraging additional <br />development. <br />~pTI~N FOUR: Complete a Small Area Plan far the White Crass Node developing <br />specific standards and guidelines governing development. <br />TIlM1=L.IN~: The implementation of this option involves the following timeline: <br />. Development of a formal proposal to initiate the Brnall Area <br />Planning process for review and approval by the BC~CC -- <br />approximately one ~1 }month, <br />2. Sanctioning of the Small Area Plan proposal by the B~JCC <br />unknouun timeline. <br />3. Advertise the creation of a Small Area Plan Task Force to <br />invite community representatives to participate in the Plan <br />development -~ approximately one ~1}month, <br />4. Creation of the Task Force by the BC~CC -~ unknown timeline, <br />5. Community meetings... and outreach .developing the Plan ~- <br />approximately six ~6} to nine ~9} months from date Task Force <br />is formed, <br />6. Completion of Small Area Plan ~ approximately two ~2} <br />months, <br />?. Approval of Plan by Task Farce - approximately one ~~ } <br />month, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.