Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-19-1999 - 9b1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 01-19-1999
>
Agenda - 01-19-1999 - 9b1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2015 11:28:59 AM
Creation date
7/17/2009 4:31:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/19/1999
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9b1
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990119
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WAIS Document Retrieval <br />[Federal Register: January <br />[Notices] <br />[Page 2237 -2241] <br />From the Federal Register <br />[DOCID:frl3ja99 -81] <br />13, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 8)] <br />Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] <br />----------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION <br />[Docket No. 50 -400] <br />Carolina Power & Light; Notice of Consideration of Issuance of <br />Amendment to Facility Operating License, Proposed No Significant <br />Hazards Consideration Determination, and Opportunity for a Hearing <br />The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is <br />considering issuance of an amendment to Facility Operating License No. <br />NPF -63 issued to Carolina Power & Light (CP &L or the licensee) for <br />operation of the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant <br />[[Page 2238]] <br />located in Wake and Chatham Counties, North Carolina. <br />The proposed amendment would support a modification to the plant tc <br />increase the spent fuel storage capacity by adding rack modules to <br />spent fuel pools (SFPs) ''C'' and ''D'' and placing the pools in <br />service. In order to activate the pools, CP &L requests that the NRC <br />review and approve the following: <br />i. Revised Technical Specification 5.6 to identify PWR burnup <br />restrictions, BWR enrichment limits, pool capacities, heat load <br />limitations and nominal center -to- center distances between fuel <br />assemblies in the racks to be installed in SFPs 'C' and 'D.' <br />ii. 10 CFR 50.55a Alternative Plan to demonstrate acceptable level <br />of quality and safety in the completion of the component cooling water <br />(CCW) and SFP 'C' and 'D' cooling and cleanup system piping. <br />The cooling system for SFPs 'C' and 'D' cannot be N stamped in <br />accordance with ASME Section III since some installation records are <br />not available, a partial turnover was not performed when construction <br />was halted following the cancellation of Unit 2 and CP &L's N <br />certificate program was discontinued following completion of Unit 1. <br />iii. Unreviewed safety question for additional heat load on the CCW <br />system. The acceptability of the 1.0 MBtu /hr heat load from SFPs 'C' <br />and 'D' was demonstrated by the use of thermal - hydraulic analyses of <br />the CCW system under various operating scenarios. The dynamic modeling <br />used in the thermal - hydraulic analyses identified a decrease in the <br />minimum required CCW system flow rate to the residual heat removal heat <br />exchangers. This change has not been previously reviewed by the NRC and <br />is deemed to constitute an unreviewed safety question. <br />Before issuance of the proposed license amendment, the Commission <br />will have made findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as <br />amended (the Act) and the Commission's regulations. <br />The Commission has made a proposed determination that the amendment <br />request involves no significant hazards consideration. Under the <br />Commission's regulations in 10 CFR 50.92, this means that operation of <br />the facility in accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) <br />involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an <br />accident previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new <br />or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; <br />or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. As <br />required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the licensee has provided its analysis of <br />Page 1 of 8 <br />http: / /frwebgate2. acces ... /waisgate.cgi ?WAISdocID= 341284846 +0 +0 +0 &WAISaction = retriev 1/14/99 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.